Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Brazil
Brazil: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross was 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Brazil is 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 11.9% on the previous year and up 32.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Brazil peaked at 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.6963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Brazil ranks 35th of 167 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Brazil, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.7035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.6963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1963 | 0.6986 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1964 | 0.7392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1965 | 0.7707 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1966 | 0.7477 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1967 | 0.7743 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1968 | 0.8722 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1969 | 0.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1970 | 0.9485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1971 | 0.923 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1972 | 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1973 | 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1974 | 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1975 | 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1976 | 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1977 | 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1978 | 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1979 | 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1980 | 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1981 | 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1982 | 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1983 | 1.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1984 | 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1985 | 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1986 | 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1987 | 1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1988 | 2.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1989 | 2.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1990 | 2.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1991 | 2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1992 | 2.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1993 | 2.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1994 | 2.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1995 | 2.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1996 | 3.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1997 | 1.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -45.7% |
| 1998 | 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1999 | 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2000 | 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2001 | 1.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2002 | 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2003 | 2.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2004 | 2.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 2005 | 2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2006 | 2.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2007 | 2.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 2.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2009 | 2.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2010 | 2.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2011 | 2.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2012 | 2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2013 | 3.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 2014 | 4.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 2015 | 3.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 2016 | 2.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2017 | 3.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2018 | 3.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2019 | 3.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2020 | 4.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 2021 | 3.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2022 | 4.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2023 | 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 2.4× the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 1.6× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Brazil changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | -45.7% | 3.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7714 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.6963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.923 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 2.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 3.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 2.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 2.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 3.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 32 Mexico 4.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Paraguay 4.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Uganda 4.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Spain 4.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Ecuador 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Portugal 4.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Brazil
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0609 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 652.04 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.95 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1182 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 5.2% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Brazil?
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Brazil was 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Brazil rank for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Brazil ranks 35th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 32.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.