Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Ecuador
Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross was 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Ecuador is 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 4.1% on the previous year and up 22.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Ecuador peaked at 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.1297 1000 USD per square kilometre, in 1961.
Ecuador ranks 76th of 122 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1297 1000 USD per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1319 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1963 | 0.1481 1000 USD per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1964 | 0.1514 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1965 | 0.1585 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1966 | 0.1633 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1967 | 0.166 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1968 | 0.1751 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1969 | 0.1863 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1970 | 0.2177 1000 USD per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 1971 | 0.1901 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1972 | 0.196 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1973 | 0.1976 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1974 | 0.2261 1000 USD per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1975 | 0.2365 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1976 | 0.2395 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1977 | 0.26 1000 USD per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1978 | 0.2975 1000 USD per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1979 | 0.3103 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1980 | 0.259 1000 USD per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1981 | 0.2658 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1982 | 0.2756 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1983 | 0.2853 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1984 | 0.2922 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1985 | 0.3086 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1986 | 0.3148 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1987 | 0.3232 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1988 | 0.3601 1000 USD per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1989 | 0.3447 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1990 | 0.3522 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1991 | 0.3987 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1992 | 0.3987 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.4437 1000 USD per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1994 | 0.4491 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1995 | 0.5236 1000 USD per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1996 | 0.54 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1997 | 0.5481 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1998 | 0.6193 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1999 | 0.645 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2000 | 0.6698 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2001 | 0.7362 1000 USD per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2002 | 0.7805 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2003 | 0.7407 1000 USD per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2004 | 0.731 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2005 | 0.6763 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2006 | 0.7451 1000 USD per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2007 | 0.6573 1000 USD per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 2008 | 0.6586 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2009 | 0.7356 1000 USD per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2010 | 0.7421 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2011 | 0.7906 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2012 | 0.7551 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2013 | 0.8116 1000 USD per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2014 | 0.6621 1000 USD per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2015 | 0.6217 1000 USD per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2016 | 0.9243 1000 USD per square kilometre | +48.7% |
| 2017 | 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 2018 | 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2019 | 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.9306 1000 USD per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2021 | 0.7494 1000 USD per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 2022 | 0.9517 1000 USD per square kilometre | +27.0% |
| 2023 | 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.1% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre, 67% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2.66 1000 USD per square kilometre, 37% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | +48.7% | 0.6217 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.9243 1000 USD per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1567 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1297 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1863 1000 USD per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2371 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1901 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.3103 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3029 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.259 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.3601 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.4918 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.3522 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.645 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.7131 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.6573 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.7805 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8741 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.6217 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9056 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.7494 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 73 Tunisia 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 74 Chile 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 75 Yemen 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 77 Finland 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 78 Nigeria 0.896 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 79 Sweden 0.8691 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Ecuador?
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Ecuador was 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1297 1000 USD per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Ecuador ranks 76th out of 122 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 22.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.