Ecuador vs Yemen: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Ecuador
0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Yemen
1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
76th
Yemen rank
75th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Ecuador
  • Yemen
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Yemen currently reports 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0294 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yemen ahead.

Ecuador ranks 76th and Yemen ranks 75th of 122 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Yemen Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1567 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0571 1000 USD per square kilometre Yemen
1970s 0.2371 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2297 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0074 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.3029 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3192 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0162 1000 USD per square kilometre Yemen
1990s 0.4918 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3849 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.107 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.7131 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7251 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.012 1000 USD per square kilometre Yemen
2010s 0.8741 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9097 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0356 1000 USD per square kilometre Yemen
2020s 0.9056 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9646 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.059 1000 USD per square kilometre Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Ecuador or Yemen?
Yemen, at 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Ecuador and Yemen?
0.0294 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Yemen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Yemen?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Yemen rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Ecuador ranks 76th and Yemen ranks 75th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Yemen: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/ecuador/yemen-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/ecuador/yemen-rep/">Ecuador vs Yemen: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.