Chile vs Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Chile
1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
74th
Ecuador rank
76th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Chile
  • Ecuador
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0394 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 74th and Ecuador ranks 76th of 122 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6744 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1567 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5177 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.8171 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2371 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.58 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1980s 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3029 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.733 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4918 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8225 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7131 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4866 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8741 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2675 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9056 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2076 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chile or Ecuador?
Chile, at 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chile and Ecuador?
0.0394 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chile ranks 74th and Ecuador ranks 76th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.