Ecuador vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Ecuador
0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Ecuador rank
76th
Finland rank
77th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Ecuador
  • Finland
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0103 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Ecuador ranks 76th and Finland ranks 77th of 122 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1567 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8618 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.2371 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9961 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.3029 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.06 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.4918 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6986 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.7131 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.296 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.8152 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9557 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1405 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Ecuador or Finland?
Ecuador, at 0.9906 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Ecuador and Finland?
0.0103 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Finland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Ecuador and Finland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Ecuador ranks 76th and Finland ranks 77th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/ecuador/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/ecuador/finland/">Ecuador vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.