Jute — Other uses in Finland
Finland: Jute — Other uses was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Jute — Other uses in Finland, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
Finland recorded 0 t for jute — other uses in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, jute — other uses in Finland peaked at 2,795 t in 1971 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1995.
That places Finland 96th out of 144 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Jute — Other uses in Finland, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 637 t | — |
| 1962 | 985 t | +54.6% |
| 1963 | 1,010 t | +2.5% |
| 1964 | 614 t | -39.2% |
| 1965 | 750 t | +22.1% |
| 1966 | 1,143 t | +52.4% |
| 1967 | 1,255 t | +9.8% |
| 1968 | 1,620 t | +29.1% |
| 1969 | 2,045 t | +26.2% |
| 1970 | 2,599 t | +27.1% |
| 1971 | 2,795 t | +7.5% |
| 1972 | 2,218 t | -20.6% |
| 1973 | 2,471 t | +11.4% |
| 1974 | 2,515 t | +1.8% |
| 1975 | 1,494 t | -40.6% |
| 1976 | 2,302 t | +54.1% |
| 1977 | 1,728 t | -24.9% |
| 1978 | 1,871 t | +8.3% |
| 1979 | 1,514 t | -19.1% |
| 1980 | 1,219 t | -19.5% |
| 1981 | 1,111 t | -8.9% |
| 1982 | 978 t | -12.0% |
| 1983 | 822 t | -16.0% |
| 1984 | 1,473 t | +79.2% |
| 1985 | 450 t | -69.5% |
| 1986 | 633 t | +40.7% |
| 1987 | 2 t | -99.7% |
| 1988 | 5 t | +150.0% |
| 1989 | 270 t | +5300.0% |
| 1990 | 20 t | -92.6% |
| 1991 | 48 t | +140.0% |
| 1992 | 1 t | -97.9% |
| 1993 | 4 t | +300.0% |
| 1994 | 64 t | +1500.0% |
| 1995 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1996 | 0 t | — |
| 1997 | 0 t | — |
| 1998 | 0 t | — |
| 1999 | 0 t | — |
| 2000 | 10 t | — |
| 2001 | 2 t | -80.0% |
| 2002 | 11 t | +450.0% |
| 2003 | 1 t | -90.9% |
| 2004 | 1 t | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 3 t | +200.0% |
| 2006 | 1 t | -66.7% |
| 2007 | 11 t | +1000.0% |
| 2008 | 11 t | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 9 t | -18.2% |
| 2010 | 9 t | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 11 t | +22.2% |
| 2012 | 9 t | -18.2% |
| 2013 | 0 t | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,118 t | 614 t | 2,045 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 2,151 t | 1,494 t | 2,795 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 696.3 t | 2 t | 1,473 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 13.7 t | 0 t | 64 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 6 t | 1 t | 11 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.25 t | 0 t | 11 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 96 Albania 0 t compare
- 96 Argentina 0 t compare
- 96 Armenia 0 t compare
- 96 Bahamas 0 t compare
- 96 Barbados 0 t compare
- 96 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 t compare
- 96 Botswana 0 t compare
- 96 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
- 96 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 96 Central African Republic 0 t compare
- 96 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 96 Colombia 0 t compare
- 96 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 96 Cuba 0 t compare
- 96 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 96 Czechoslovakia 0 t compare
- 96 Estonia 0 t compare
- 96 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 96 French Polynesia 0 t compare
- 96 Gabon 0 t compare
- 96 Grenada 0 t compare
- 96 Haiti 0 t compare
- 96 Israel 0 t compare
- 96 Jamaica 0 t compare
- 96 Kenya 0 t compare
- 96 Kiribati 0 t compare
- 96 Kyrgyzstan 0 t compare
- 96 Latvia 0 t compare
- 96 Liberia 0 t compare
- 96 Luxembourg 0 t compare
- 96 Madagascar 0 t compare
- 96 Mali 0 t compare
- 96 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 96 Mauritius 0 t compare
- 96 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 96 Morocco 0 t compare
- 96 Mozambique 0 t compare
- 96 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 96 North Macedonia 0 t compare
- 96 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 96 Rwanda 0 t compare
- 96 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t compare
- 96 Sierra Leone 0 t compare
- 96 Solomon Islands 0 t compare
- 96 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 96 Uganda 0 t compare
- 96 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 96 Yemen 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Finland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0261 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,466 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5476 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2548 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 2.61 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 2.61 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 7.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is jute — other uses in Finland?
- Jute — other uses in Finland was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest jute — other uses recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 2,795 t in 1971.
- What is the lowest jute — other uses recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1995.
- How does Finland rank for jute — other uses?
- Finland ranks 96th out of 144 countries with data for 2013.
- Is jute — other uses rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Jute — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.