Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses in Ethiopia PDR

Ethiopia PDR: Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses was 17,573 t in 1992. ▲ Rising

Latest (1992)
17,573 t
Change on year
up 1.0%
World rank
11th
of 140 countries
All-time high
30,300 t
in 1983
All-time low
11,000 t
in 1961
Years of data
32
1961–1992

Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses in Ethiopia PDR, 1961–1992

010.0k20.0k30.0k1961197619921961: 11.0k t1962: 11.0k t1963: 11.8k t1964: 12.0k t1965: 12.0k t1966: 12.2k t1967: 12.4k t1968: 12.6k t1969: 12.8k t1970: 13.1k t1971: 13.4k t1972: 13.8k t1973: 14.0k t1974: 15.0k t1975: 15.0k t1976: 15.2k t1977: 15.1k t1978: 15.0k t1979: 15.0k t1980: 17.0k t1981: 18.6k t1982: 23.9k t1983: 30.3k t1984: 23.8k t1985: 19.1k t1986: 20.1k t1987: 16.6k t1988: 16.7k t1989: 17.5k t1990: 17.2k t1991: 17.4k t1992: 17.6k t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for hard fibres, other — other uses in Ethiopia PDR is 17,573 t, measured in 1992.

That represents a change of up 1.0% on the previous year and down 26.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, hard fibres, other — other uses in Ethiopia PDR peaked at 30,300 t in 1983 and was at its lowest, 11,000 t, in 1961.

That places Ethiopia PDR 11th out of 140 countries with data for 1992, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.

Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses in Ethiopia PDR, year by year

Annual values for Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food) in Ethiopia PDR, 1961 to 1992.
Year t Change
1961 11,000 t
1962 11,000 t +0.0%
1963 11,800 t +7.3%
1964 12,000 t +1.7%
1965 12,000 t +0.0%
1966 12,200 t +1.7%
1967 12,400 t +1.6%
1968 12,600 t +1.6%
1969 12,800 t +1.6%
1970 13,100 t +2.3%
1971 13,400 t +2.3%
1972 13,801 t +3.0%
1973 14,003 t +1.5%
1974 15,001 t +7.1%
1975 15,000 t -0.0%
1976 15,200 t +1.3%
1977 15,102 t -0.6%
1978 15,000 t -0.7%
1979 15,000 t +0.0%
1980 16,981 t +13.2%
1981 18,560 t +9.3%
1982 23,902 t +28.8%
1983 30,300 t +26.8%
1984 23,843 t -21.3%
1985 19,081 t -20.0%
1986 20,103 t +5.4%
1987 16,600 t -17.4%
1988 16,700 t +0.6%
1989 17,500 t +4.8%
1990 17,200 t -1.7%
1991 17,400 t +1.2%
1992 17,573 t +1.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 11,978 t 11,000 t 12,800 t 9
1970s 14,461 t 13,100 t 15,200 t 10
1980s 20,357 t 16,600 t 30,300 t 10
1990s 17,391 t 17,200 t 17,573 t 3

Countries ranked near Ethiopia PDR

  1. 8 Ethiopia 21,442 t
  2. 8 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 157 t compare
  3. 9 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 20,713 t compare
  4. 10 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 18 t compare
  5. 10 Mexico 18,650 t compare
  6. 11 Republic of Moldova 0 t
  7. 12 Spain 16,770 t compare
  8. 13 Colombia 16,023 t compare
  9. 14 India 13,333 t compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Ethiopia PDR

All data for Ethiopia PDR →

Frequently asked questions

What is hard fibres, other — other uses in Ethiopia PDR?
Hard fibres, other — other uses in Ethiopia PDR was 17,573 t in 1992, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest hard fibres, other — other uses recorded in Ethiopia PDR?
The highest recorded value was 30,300 t in 1983.
What is the lowest hard fibres, other — other uses recorded in Ethiopia PDR?
The lowest recorded value was 11,000 t in 1961.
How does Ethiopia PDR rank for hard fibres, other — other uses?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 11th out of 140 countries with data for 1992.
Is hard fibres, other — other uses rising or falling in Ethiopia PDR?
Over the last ten years it is down 26.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Ethiopia PDR data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses in Ethiopia PDR. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/hard-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/ethiopia-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/hard-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/ethiopia-pdr/">Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses in Ethiopia PDR</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 8,660 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.