Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore
Singapore: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 3 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore is 3 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore peaked at 12 1000 Int$ in 1982 and was at its lowest, 2 1000 Int$, in 1987.
Singapore ranks 76th of 76 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 7 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 7 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 7 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 7 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 7 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 8 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1967 | 8 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 9 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1969 | 10 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1970 | 9 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 1971 | 9 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 10 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1973 | 10 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 11 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 1975 | 11 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 9 1000 Int$ | -18.2% |
| 1977 | 10 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1978 | 10 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 11 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 1980 | 11 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 10 1000 Int$ | -9.1% |
| 1982 | 12 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
| 1983 | 9 1000 Int$ | -25.0% |
| 1984 | 9 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 7 1000 Int$ | -22.2% |
| 1986 | 3 1000 Int$ | -57.1% |
| 1987 | 2 1000 Int$ | -33.3% |
| 1988 | 3 1000 Int$ | +50.0% |
| 1989 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 2 1000 Int$ | -33.3% |
| 1991 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1000 Int$ | +50.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
Singapore compared with similar countries
- Singapore's 3 1000 Int$ is below the median for high income countries, which is 175.5 1000 Int$, 2% of the median. (16 countries reporting)
- Singapore's 3 1000 Int$ is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3,226 1000 Int$, 0% of the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.78 1000 Int$ | 7 1000 Int$ | 10 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 10 1000 Int$ | 9 1000 Int$ | 11 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 6.9 1000 Int$ | 2 1000 Int$ | 12 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 2 1000 Int$ | 2 1000 Int$ | 2 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.3 1000 Int$ | 2 1000 Int$ | 3 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 3 1000 Int$ | 3 1000 Int$ | 3 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 3 1000 Int$ | 3 1000 Int$ | 3 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
More agriculture & rural data for Singapore
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -1.4 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 24.33 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.2% (2024)
- Rural population 0.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore was 3 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 12 1000 Int$ in 1982.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1000 Int$ in 1987.
- How does Singapore rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Singapore ranks 76th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.