Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual was 2.15 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) recorded 2.15 % change on previous year for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual in 2024.
That represents a change of down 53.6% on the previous year and up 44.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) peaked at 21.64 % change on previous year in 1993 and was at its lowest, -21.4 % change on previous year, in 1991.
That places Least Developed Countries (LDCs) 19th out of 30 groups with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 1.99 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 2.7 % change on previous year | +36.2% |
| 1964 | 2.39 % change on previous year | -11.7% |
| 1965 | 0.2493 % change on previous year | -89.6% |
| 1966 | 6.63 % change on previous year | +2558.4% |
| 1967 | 3.8 % change on previous year | -42.6% |
| 1968 | 3.03 % change on previous year | -20.5% |
| 1969 | 1.18 % change on previous year | -61.1% |
| 1970 | 1.1 % change on previous year | -6.4% |
| 1971 | -3.33 % change on previous year | -402.3% |
| 1972 | -0.648 % change on previous year | -80.6% |
| 1973 | -0.5823 % change on previous year | -10.1% |
| 1974 | 3.08 % change on previous year | -629.5% |
| 1975 | 1.25 % change on previous year | -59.5% |
| 1976 | 2 % change on previous year | +60.1% |
| 1977 | 2.76 % change on previous year | +38.2% |
| 1978 | 8.97 % change on previous year | +224.5% |
| 1979 | -0.2609 % change on previous year | -102.9% |
| 1980 | -1.87 % change on previous year | +616.4% |
| 1981 | 4.31 % change on previous year | -330.6% |
| 1982 | 1.8 % change on previous year | -58.2% |
| 1983 | 0.6823 % change on previous year | -62.2% |
| 1984 | 1.9 % change on previous year | +177.9% |
| 1985 | 2.9 % change on previous year | +53.0% |
| 1986 | 4.23 % change on previous year | +45.8% |
| 1987 | -5.94 % change on previous year | -240.5% |
| 1988 | 3.54 % change on previous year | -159.6% |
| 1989 | 3.85 % change on previous year | +8.6% |
| 1990 | 1.85 % change on previous year | -52.0% |
| 1991 | -21.4 % change on previous year | -1258.1% |
| 1992 | 2.87 % change on previous year | -113.4% |
| 1993 | 21.64 % change on previous year | +653.9% |
| 1994 | 1.76 % change on previous year | -91.9% |
| 1995 | 2.35 % change on previous year | +33.8% |
| 1996 | 5.43 % change on previous year | +130.9% |
| 1997 | 2.84 % change on previous year | -47.7% |
| 1998 | 3.54 % change on previous year | +24.6% |
| 1999 | 5 % change on previous year | +41.2% |
| 2000 | -2.58 % change on previous year | -151.7% |
| 2001 | 1.25 % change on previous year | -148.3% |
| 2002 | 5.66 % change on previous year | +354.1% |
| 2003 | 3.05 % change on previous year | -46.1% |
| 2004 | 1.66 % change on previous year | -45.7% |
| 2005 | 4.94 % change on previous year | +198.4% |
| 2006 | 2.94 % change on previous year | -40.4% |
| 2007 | 0.919 % change on previous year | -68.8% |
| 2008 | 4.34 % change on previous year | +372.3% |
| 2009 | 3.57 % change on previous year | -17.7% |
| 2010 | 6.38 % change on previous year | +78.6% |
| 2011 | 2.46 % change on previous year | -61.4% |
| 2012 | 2.64 % change on previous year | +7.3% |
| 2013 | 2.38 % change on previous year | -9.9% |
| 2014 | 1.48 % change on previous year | -37.6% |
| 2015 | 1.07 % change on previous year | -27.7% |
| 2016 | 1.61 % change on previous year | +49.6% |
| 2017 | 7.72 % change on previous year | +380.7% |
| 2018 | -5.59 % change on previous year | -172.4% |
| 2019 | 3.69 % change on previous year | -166.0% |
| 2020 | 0.8437 % change on previous year | -77.1% |
| 2021 | -0.3193 % change on previous year | -137.8% |
| 2022 | 1.75 % change on previous year | -648.6% |
| 2023 | 4.63 % change on previous year | +164.2% |
| 2024 | 2.15 % change on previous year | -53.6% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | +2558.4% | 0.2493 % change on previous year | 6.63 % change on previous year |
| 1991 | -1258.1% | 1.85 % change on previous year | -21.4 % change on previous year |
| 1993 | +653.9% | 2.87 % change on previous year | 21.64 % change on previous year |
| 2022 | +648.6% | -0.3193 % change on previous year | 1.75 % change on previous year |
| 1974 | +629.5% | -0.5823 % change on previous year | 3.08 % change on previous year |
| 1980 | -616.4% | -0.2609 % change on previous year | -1.87 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.75 % change on previous year | 0.2493 % change on previous year | 6.63 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 1.43 % change on previous year | -3.33 % change on previous year | 8.97 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.54 % change on previous year | -5.94 % change on previous year | 4.31 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.59 % change on previous year | -21.4 % change on previous year | 21.64 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.57 % change on previous year | -2.58 % change on previous year | 5.66 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.38 % change on previous year | -5.59 % change on previous year | 7.72 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.81 % change on previous year | -0.3193 % change on previous year | 4.63 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- 16 Turkmenistan 11.81 % change on previous year compare
- 17 Benin 11.2 % change on previous year compare
- 18 Poland 11.17 % change on previous year compare
- 19 Malaysia 10.58 % change on previous year compare
- 20 Australia and New Zealand 10.31 % change on previous year compare
- 21 Sri Lanka 9.42 % change on previous year compare
- 22 Kenya 9.32 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Production, annual growth rate -0.2093 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, annual growth rate 4.31 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw hides and skins of cattle — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual 0.3792 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, annual growth rate 2.47 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw hides and skins of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth 5 % change on previous year (2024)
- Potatoes — Production, annual growth rate 0.4 % change on previous year (2024)
- Potatoes — Yield, annual growth rate -1.36 % change on previous year (2024)
- Potatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 1.78 % change on previous year (2024)
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Yield, annual 4.6 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) was 2.15 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 21.64 % change on previous year in 1993.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was -21.4 % change on previous year in 1991.
- How does Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 19th out of 30 groups with data for 2024.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual rising or falling in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 44.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Least Developed Countries (LDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.