Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Poland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2.15 % change on previous year
in 2024
Poland
11.17 % change on previous year
in 2017
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
19th
Poland rank
18th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Poland
-20-100102030196219932024

How they compare

Poland currently reports 11.17 % change on previous year against 2.15 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 9.02 % change on previous year.

That makes Poland's figure about 5.2 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Poland ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 19th and Poland ranks 18th of 30 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 2.75 % change on previous year 5.55 % change on previous year 2.8 % change on previous year Poland
1970s 1.43 % change on previous year 1.46 % change on previous year 0.0224 % change on previous year Poland
1980s 1.54 % change on previous year -0.5484 % change on previous year 2.09 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 2.59 % change on previous year -4.16 % change on previous year 6.75 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 2.57 % change on previous year 0.7026 % change on previous year 1.87 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 3.22 % change on previous year 4.86 % change on previous year 1.64 % change on previous year Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Poland?
Poland, at 11.17 % change on previous year against 2.15 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Poland?
9.02 % change on previous year, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Poland?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Poland rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 19th and Poland ranks 18th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Poland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/poland/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Poland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.