Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malaysia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 10.58 % change on previous year against 2.15 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 8.43 % change on previous year.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 4.9 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 31 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 19th and Malaysia ranks 19th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.75 % change on previous year | 1.52 % change on previous year | 1.23 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1970s | 1.43 % change on previous year | 5.21 % change on previous year | 3.77 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 1.54 % change on previous year | 1.62 % change on previous year | 0.0825 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 2.59 % change on previous year | 3.97 % change on previous year | 1.38 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 2.57 % change on previous year | 8.58 % change on previous year | 6 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 2.38 % change on previous year | 0.7651 % change on previous year | 1.62 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.81 % change on previous year | 1.86 % change on previous year | 0.0519 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 10.58 % change on previous year against 2.15 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malaysia?
- 8.43 % change on previous year, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malaysia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malaysia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 19th and Malaysia ranks 19th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.