Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Sri Lanka: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 9.42 % change on previous year against 2.15 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 7.27 % change on previous year.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 4.4 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 34 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 19th and Sri Lanka ranks 21st of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.75 % change on previous year | 3.87 % change on previous year | 1.13 % change on previous year | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 1.43 % change on previous year | -3.08 % change on previous year | 4.51 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1980s | 1.54 % change on previous year | -1.37 % change on previous year | 2.91 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1990s | 2.59 % change on previous year | 1.75 % change on previous year | 0.8377 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2000s | 2.57 % change on previous year | 0.0577 % change on previous year | 2.52 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2010s | 2.38 % change on previous year | -0.244 % change on previous year | 2.63 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.81 % change on previous year | 0.1208 % change on previous year | 1.69 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 9.42 % change on previous year against 2.15 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Sri Lanka?
- 7.27 % change on previous year, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Sri Lanka rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 19th and Sri Lanka ranks 21st of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.