Cottonseed — Stock Variation in Middle Africa

Middle Africa: Cottonseed — Stock Variation was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
0 t
Rank
11th
of 21 regions
All-time high
77,000 t
in 1999
All-time low
-109,600 t
in 2005
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Cottonseed — Stock Variation in Middle Africa, 1961–2013

-100.0k-50.0k050.0k100.0k196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cottonseed — stock variation in Middle Africa is 0 t, measured in 2013.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cottonseed — stock variation in Middle Africa peaked at 77,000 t in 1999 and was at its lowest, -109,600 t, in 2005.

Middle Africa ranks 11th of 21 regions on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s -11,222 t -36,000 t 3,000 t 9
1970s -1,500 t -28,000 t 15,000 t 10
1980s -9,000 t -54,000 t 37,000 t 10
1990s 11,200 t -54,000 t 77,000 t 10
2000s -2,450 t -109,600 t 65,300 t 10
2010s -3,625 t -11,500 t 0 t 4

Countries ranked near Middle Africa

  1. 8 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 200 t compare
  2. 8 Yugoslav SFR 200 t compare
  3. 10 Nepal 80 t compare
  4. 11 Barbados 15 t compare
  5. 11 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 15 t compare
  6. 13 Romania 10 t compare
  7. 14 Algeria 0 t compare
  8. 14 Argentina 0 t compare
  9. 14 Austria 0 t compare
  10. 14 Azerbaijan, Republic of 0 t compare
  11. 14 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 t compare
  12. 14 Benin 0 t compare
  13. 14 Brazil 0 t compare
  14. 14 Bulgaria 0 t compare
  15. 14 Cambodia 0 t compare
  16. 14 Cameroon 0 t compare
  17. 14 Central African Republic 0 t compare
  18. 14 Chad 0 t compare
  19. 14 China, mainland 0 t compare
  20. 14 Colombia 0 t compare
  21. 14 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
  22. 14 Denmark 0 t compare
  23. 14 Egypt 0 t compare
  24. 14 Estonia, Republic of 0 t compare
  25. 14 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 t compare
  26. 14 Ethiopia PDR 0 t compare
  27. 14 Germany 0 t compare
  28. 14 Ghana 0 t compare
  29. 14 Greece 0 t compare
  30. 14 Grenada 0 t compare
  31. 14 Honduras 0 t compare
  32. 14 Hungary 0 t compare
  33. 14 Indonesia 0 t compare
  34. 14 Ireland 0 t compare
  35. 14 Japan 0 t compare
  36. 14 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 t compare
  37. 14 Lebanon 0 t compare
  38. 14 Malaysia 0 t compare
  39. 14 Mali 0 t compare
  40. 14 Mexico 0 t compare
  41. 14 Morocco 0 t compare
  42. 14 Niger 0 t compare
  43. 14 Pakistan 0 t compare
  44. 14 Paraguay 0 t compare
  45. 14 Peru 0 t compare
  46. 14 Philippines 0 t compare
  47. 14 Senegal 0 t compare
  48. 14 Sweden 0 t compare
  49. 14 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 t compare
  50. 14 Thailand 0 t compare
  51. 14 Tunisia 0 t compare
  52. 14 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
  53. 14 Yemen, Republic of 0 t compare
  54. 14 Zambia 0 t compare
  55. 14 Zimbabwe 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 99 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Middle Africa

All data for Middle Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is cottonseed — stock variation in Middle Africa?
Cottonseed — stock variation in Middle Africa was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest cottonseed — stock variation recorded in Middle Africa?
The highest recorded value was 77,000 t in 1999.
What is the lowest cottonseed — stock variation recorded in Middle Africa?
The lowest recorded value was -109,600 t in 2005.
How does Middle Africa rank for cottonseed — stock variation?
Middle Africa ranks 11th out of 21 regions with data for 2013.
Is cottonseed — stock variation rising or falling in Middle Africa?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Middle Africa data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Cottonseed — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cottonseed — Stock Variation in Middle Africa. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/cottonseed-stock-variation/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/cottonseed-stock-variation/middle-africa/">Cottonseed — Stock Variation in Middle Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cottonseed — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
99 places, 4,949 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.