Rwanda vs Saint Lucia: Percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services
Percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services over time
- Rwanda
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 83 % against 81 % in Rwanda, a difference of 2 %.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 126th and Saint Lucia ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.6 % | 84.6 % | 33 % | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 67.2 % | 83.2 % | 16 % | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 77.33 % | 83 % | 5.67 % | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services, Rwanda or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 83 % against 81 % in Rwanda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services between Rwanda and Saint Lucia?
- 2 %, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saint Lucia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Rwanda and Saint Lucia rank globally for percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services?
- Rwanda ranks 126th and Saint Lucia ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.