United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Palmkernel Cake — Feed
Palmkernel Cake — Feed over time
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 520,006 t against 5,499 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 514,507 t.
That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 94.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 101 countries.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 34,951 t | 101.11 t | 34,850 t | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 1970s | 14,055 t | 2,131 t | 11,923 t | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 1980s | 51,806 t | 2,696 t | 49,110 t | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 1990s | 234,676 t | 3,231 t | 231,445 t | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2000s | 588,508 t | 3,734 t | 584,775 t | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2010s | 477,947 t | 5,057 t | 472,890 t | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher palmkernel cake — feed, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 520,006 t against 5,499 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2013.
- What is the difference in palmkernel cake — feed between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 514,507 t, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
- How do United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for palmkernel cake — feed?
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Palmkernel Cake — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.