China, Hong Kong SAR vs Polynesia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.05 t
in 2024
Polynesia
0.61 t
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
233rd
Polynesia rank
231st

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Polynesia
0102030196119922024

How they compare

Polynesia currently reports 0.61 t against 0.05 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.56 t.

That makes Polynesia's figure about 12.2 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Polynesia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 233rd and Polynesia ranks 231st of 234 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Polynesia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0911 t 5.12 t 5.03 t Polynesia
1970s 2.85 t 3.62 t 0.769 t Polynesia
1980s 3.58 t 1.31 t 2.28 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.7589 t 0.5333 t 0.2256 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.04 t 0.61 t 0.57 t Polynesia
2010s 0.046 t 0.61 t 0.564 t Polynesia
2020s 0.05 t 0.61 t 0.56 t Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, China, Hong Kong SAR or Polynesia?
Polynesia, at 0.61 t against 0.05 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between China, Hong Kong SAR and Polynesia?
0.56 t, with Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Polynesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Polynesia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 233rd and Polynesia ranks 231st of 234 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Polynesia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/china-hong-kong-sar/polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/china-hong-kong-sar/polynesia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Polynesia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
264 places, 14,768 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.