Land locked developing countries vs Nicaragua: Edible Fat Total — Food aid received
Land locked developing countries
21 t
in 2010
Nicaragua
32 t
in 2001
Land locked developing countries rank
4th
Nicaragua rank
9th
Edible Fat Total — Food aid received over time
- Land locked developing countries
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 32 t against 21 t in Land locked developing countries, a difference of 11 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.5 times Land locked developing countries's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Land locked developing countries has been ahead every year.
Land locked developing countries ranks 4th and Nicaragua ranks 9th of 4 regions.
Land locked developing countries has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land locked developing countries | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,881 t | 406.67 t | 5,475 t | Land locked developing countries |
| 2000s | 4,562 t | 443.5 t | 4,119 t | Land locked developing countries |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible fat total — food aid received, Land locked developing countries or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 32 t against 21 t in Land locked developing countries as of 2001.
- What is the difference in edible fat total — food aid received between Land locked developing countries and Nicaragua?
- 11 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land locked developing countries and Nicaragua?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2001.
- How do Land locked developing countries and Nicaragua rank globally for edible fat total — food aid received?
- Land locked developing countries ranks 4th and Nicaragua ranks 9th of 4 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible Fat Total — Food aid received. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.