Belarus vs China: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of
Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of over time
- Belarus
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 3,492 kcal/cap/d against 3,453 kcal/cap/d in Belarus, a difference of 39 kcal/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 28th and China ranks 26th of 148 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,976 kcal/cap/d | 2,894 kcal/cap/d | 81.8 kcal/cap/d | Belarus |
| 2010s | 3,320 kcal/cap/d | 3,209 kcal/cap/d | 110.7 kcal/cap/d | Belarus |
| 2020s | 3,428 kcal/cap/d | 3,459 kcal/cap/d | 31.25 kcal/cap/d | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of, Belarus or China?
- China, at 3,492 kcal/cap/d against 3,453 kcal/cap/d in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of between Belarus and China?
- 39 kcal/cap/d, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and China rank globally for dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of?
- Belarus ranks 28th and China ranks 26th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.