Bangladesh vs Togo: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of

Bangladesh
2,639 kcal/cap/d
in 2023
Togo
2,629 kcal/cap/d
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
115th
Togo rank
117th

Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Togo
01.0k2.0k3.0k200020112023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 2,639 kcal/cap/d against 2,629 kcal/cap/d in Togo, a difference of 10 kcal/cap/d.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 115th and Togo ranks 117th of 148 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Togo Difference Ahead
2000s 2,382 kcal/cap/d 2,307 kcal/cap/d 74.6 kcal/cap/d Bangladesh
2010s 2,461 kcal/cap/d 2,365 kcal/cap/d 96.1 kcal/cap/d Bangladesh
2020s 2,617 kcal/cap/d 2,564 kcal/cap/d 52.25 kcal/cap/d Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of, Bangladesh or Togo?
Bangladesh, at 2,639 kcal/cap/d against 2,629 kcal/cap/d in Togo as of 2023.
What is the difference in dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of between Bangladesh and Togo?
10 kcal/cap/d, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Togo?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Togo rank globally for dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of?
Bangladesh ranks 115th and Togo ranks 117th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Togo: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal-2/bangladesh/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal-2/bangladesh/togo/">Bangladesh vs Togo: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
kcal/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
202 places, 4,806 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.