Saint Lucia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Saint Lucia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 100 % against 49.8 % in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 50.2 %.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 2.0 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Saint Lucia ranks 1st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 4th of 158 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.03 % | 41.31 % | 56.72 % | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 98.65 % | 48.9 % | 49.75 % | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Saint Lucia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Saint Lucia, at 100 % against 49.8 % in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2021.
- What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Saint Lucia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 50.2 %, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Saint Lucia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Saint Lucia ranks 1st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 4th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.