Malta vs St. Lucia: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Malta
- St. Lucia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 100 % against 100 % in St. Lucia, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was St. Lucia ahead.
Malta ranks 1st and St. Lucia ranks 1st of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and St. Lucia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | St. Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.82 % | 98.25 % | 7.43 % | St. Lucia |
| 2010s | 92.62 % | 98.03 % | 5.41 % | St. Lucia |
| 2020s | 100 % | 98.65 % | 1.35 % | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Malta or St. Lucia?
- Malta, at 100 % against 100 % in St. Lucia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Malta and St. Lucia?
- 0 %, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and St. Lucia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Malta and St. Lucia rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Malta ranks 1st and St. Lucia ranks 1st of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.