Europe vs Mauritius: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Europe
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 90.9 % against -26.7 % in Europe, a difference of 117.6 %.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 3.4 times Europe's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 35th and Mauritius ranks 29th of 38 regions.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -8.14 % | 97.4 % | 105.54 % | Mauritius |
| 2010s | -18.91 % | 96.76 % | 115.67 % | Mauritius |
| 2020s | -25.1 % | 92.35 % | 117.45 % | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Europe or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 90.9 % against -26.7 % in Europe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Europe and Mauritius?
- 117.6 %, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Mauritius?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Europe and Mauritius rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Europe ranks 35th and Mauritius ranks 29th of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.