Eastern Asia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value

Eastern Asia
12.2 %
in 2021
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-0.3 %
in 2021
Eastern Asia rank
16th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
17th

Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • Eastern Asia
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
-50510200020102021

How they compare

Eastern Asia currently reports 12.2 % against -0.3 % in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 12.5 %.

That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 40.7 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.

Eastern Asia ranks 16th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 17th of 37 groups.

Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Asia Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 8.49 % -0.39 % 8.88 % Eastern Asia
2010s 6.77 % -2.07 % 8.84 % Eastern Asia
2020s 11.7 % -0.1 % 11.8 % Eastern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Eastern Asia or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Eastern Asia, at 12.2 % against -0.3 % in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2021.
What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Eastern Asia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
12.5 %, with Eastern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Eastern Asia and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
Eastern Asia ranks 16th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 17th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Asia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/eastern-asia/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/eastern-asia/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/">Eastern Asia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 4,414 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.