Mexico vs Samoa: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Mexico
- Samoa
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 137 % against 137 % in Samoa, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 38th and Samoa ranks 38th of 148 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 138.3 % | 124.9 % | 13.4 % | Mexico |
| 2010s | 134.1 % | 128.9 % | 5.2 % | Mexico |
| 2020s | 136.5 % | 135.5 % | 1 % | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Mexico or Samoa?
- Mexico, at 137 % against 137 % in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Mexico and Samoa?
- 0 %, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Samoa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Samoa rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Mexico ranks 38th and Samoa ranks 38th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.