Congo vs Solomon Islands: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Congo
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 100 % against 99 % in Congo, a difference of 1 %.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 139th and Solomon Islands ranks 138th of 148 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.2 % | 112.3 % | 16.1 % | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 95.6 % | 106.4 % | 10.8 % | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 99 % | 100 % | 1 % | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Congo or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 100 % against 99 % in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Congo and Solomon Islands?
- 1 %, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Solomon Islands?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Solomon Islands rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Congo ranks 139th and Solomon Islands ranks 138th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.