Comoros vs South Sudan: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Comoros
- South Sudan
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 108 % against 108 % in South Sudan, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 129th and South Sudan ranks 129th of 148 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 110 % | 106 % | 4 % | Comoros |
| 2020s | 107.75 % | 107.75 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Comoros or South Sudan?
- Comoros, at 108 % against 108 % in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Comoros and South Sudan?
- 0 %, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and South Sudan rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Comoros ranks 129th and South Sudan ranks 129th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.