Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses in Malta
Malta: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses was 35 t in 2013. ▲ Rising
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses in Malta, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, wool (clean eq.) — other uses in Malta stood at 35 t.
That represents a change of down 35.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, wool (clean eq.) — other uses in Malta peaked at 61 t in 1990 and was at its lowest, 18 t, in 1973.
That places Malta 102nd out of 128 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 53 years of available data.
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses in Malta, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 42 t | — |
| 1962 | 41 t | -2.4% |
| 1963 | 41 t | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 41 t | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 38 t | -7.3% |
| 1966 | 38 t | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 35 t | -7.9% |
| 1968 | 33 t | -5.7% |
| 1969 | 35 t | +6.1% |
| 1970 | 36 t | +2.9% |
| 1971 | 33 t | -8.3% |
| 1972 | 27 t | -18.2% |
| 1973 | 18 t | -33.3% |
| 1974 | 34 t | +88.9% |
| 1975 | 35 t | +2.9% |
| 1976 | 33 t | -5.7% |
| 1977 | 35 t | +6.1% |
| 1978 | 56 t | +60.0% |
| 1979 | 35 t | -37.5% |
| 1980 | 35 t | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 35 t | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 42 t | +20.0% |
| 1983 | 32 t | -23.8% |
| 1984 | 39 t | +21.9% |
| 1985 | 46 t | +17.9% |
| 1986 | 53 t | +15.2% |
| 1987 | 38 t | -28.3% |
| 1988 | 53 t | +39.5% |
| 1989 | 39 t | -26.4% |
| 1990 | 61 t | +56.4% |
| 1991 | 21 t | -65.6% |
| 1992 | 25 t | +19.0% |
| 1993 | 24 t | -4.0% |
| 1994 | 61 t | +154.2% |
| 1995 | 53 t | -13.1% |
| 1996 | 39 t | -26.4% |
| 1997 | 37 t | -5.1% |
| 1998 | 36 t | -2.7% |
| 1999 | 38 t | +5.6% |
| 2000 | 31 t | -18.4% |
| 2001 | 40 t | +29.0% |
| 2002 | 34 t | -15.0% |
| 2003 | 54 t | +58.8% |
| 2004 | 46 t | -14.8% |
| 2005 | 45 t | -2.2% |
| 2006 | 47 t | +4.4% |
| 2007 | 44 t | -6.4% |
| 2008 | 43 t | -2.3% |
| 2009 | 41 t | -4.7% |
| 2010 | 35 t | -14.6% |
| 2011 | 36 t | +2.9% |
| 2012 | 35 t | -2.8% |
| 2013 | 35 t | +0.0% |
Malta compared with similar countries
- Malta's 35 t is below the median for high income countries, which is 3,724 t, 1% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Malta's 35 t is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 12,501 t, 0% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses in Malta changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | +154.2% | 24 t | 61 t |
| 1974 | +88.9% | 18 t | 34 t |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 38.22 t | 33 t | 42 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 34.2 t | 18 t | 56 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 41.2 t | 32 t | 53 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 39.5 t | 21 t | 61 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 42.5 t | 31 t | 54 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 35.25 t | 35 t | 36 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Malta
More agriculture & rural data for Malta
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 6.05 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0047 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 224.75 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.3 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0432 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is wool (clean eq.) — other uses in Malta?
- Wool (clean eq.) — other uses in Malta was 35 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest wool (clean eq.) — other uses recorded in Malta?
- The highest recorded value was 61 t in 1990.
- What is the lowest wool (clean eq.) — other uses recorded in Malta?
- The lowest recorded value was 18 t in 1973.
- How does Malta rank for wool (clean eq.) — other uses?
- Malta ranks 102nd out of 128 countries with data for 2013.
- Is wool (clean eq.) — other uses rising or falling in Malta?
- Over the last ten years it is down 35.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Malta data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.