Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses in China, Hong Kong SAR
China, Hong Kong SAR: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses was 120 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses in China, Hong Kong SAR, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for wool (clean eq.) — other uses in China, Hong Kong SAR is 120 t, measured in 2013.
The figure is up 471.4% on the previous year and down 94.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, wool (clean eq.) — other uses in China, Hong Kong SAR peaked at 3,172 t in 1973 and was at its lowest, 3 t, in 1989.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th of 128 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses in China, Hong Kong SAR, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 50 t | — |
| 1962 | 100 t | +100.0% |
| 1963 | 430 t | +330.0% |
| 1964 | 590 t | +37.2% |
| 1965 | 770 t | +30.5% |
| 1966 | 924 t | +20.0% |
| 1967 | 1,349 t | +46.0% |
| 1968 | 1,679 t | +24.5% |
| 1969 | 2,019 t | +20.3% |
| 1970 | 2,829 t | +40.1% |
| 1971 | 1,564 t | -44.7% |
| 1972 | 1,421 t | -9.1% |
| 1973 | 3,172 t | +123.2% |
| 1974 | 1,021 t | -67.8% |
| 1975 | 1,665 t | +63.1% |
| 1976 | 2,671 t | +60.4% |
| 1977 | 2,241 t | -16.1% |
| 1978 | 2,160 t | -3.6% |
| 1979 | 2,742 t | +26.9% |
| 1980 | 2,792 t | +1.8% |
| 1981 | 1,057 t | -62.1% |
| 1982 | 834 t | -21.1% |
| 1983 | 1,935 t | +132.0% |
| 1984 | 1,447 t | -25.2% |
| 1985 | 1,904 t | +31.6% |
| 1986 | 2,730 t | +43.4% |
| 1987 | 1,899 t | -30.4% |
| 1988 | 1,776 t | -6.5% |
| 1989 | 3 t | -99.8% |
| 1990 | 614 t | +20366.7% |
| 1991 | 302 t | -50.8% |
| 1992 | 982 t | +225.2% |
| 1993 | 955 t | -2.7% |
| 1994 | 1,058 t | +10.8% |
| 1995 | 1,314 t | +24.2% |
| 1996 | 1,882 t | +43.2% |
| 1997 | 481 t | -74.4% |
| 1998 | 180 t | -62.6% |
| 1999 | 84 t | -53.3% |
| 2000 | 1,979 t | +2256.0% |
| 2001 | 1,515 t | -23.4% |
| 2002 | 1,599 t | +5.5% |
| 2003 | 2,254 t | +41.0% |
| 2004 | 1,973 t | -12.5% |
| 2005 | 2,083 t | +5.6% |
| 2006 | 2,199 t | +5.6% |
| 2007 | 993 t | -54.8% |
| 2008 | 320 t | -67.8% |
| 2009 | 127 t | -60.3% |
| 2010 | 427 t | +236.2% |
| 2011 | 595 t | +39.3% |
| 2012 | 21 t | -96.5% |
| 2013 | 120 t | +471.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 879 t | 50 t | 2,019 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 2,149 t | 1,021 t | 3,172 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 1,638 t | 3 t | 2,792 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 785.2 t | 84 t | 1,882 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,504 t | 127 t | 2,254 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 290.75 t | 21 t | 595 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near China, Hong Kong SAR
More agriculture & rural data for China, Hong Kong SAR
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual -5.42 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual -5.42 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing 1.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fat of pigs — Production, annual growth rate -5.42 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fat of pigs — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate 1.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight -7.41 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate 0.1332 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate 0.0017 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate 0.231 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is wool (clean eq.) — other uses in China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Wool (clean eq.) — other uses in China, Hong Kong SAR was 120 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest wool (clean eq.) — other uses recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
- The highest recorded value was 3,172 t in 1973.
- What is the lowest wool (clean eq.) — other uses recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 t in 1989.
- How does China, Hong Kong SAR rank for wool (clean eq.) — other uses?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th out of 128 countries with data for 2013.
- Is wool (clean eq.) — other uses rising or falling in China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Over the last ten years it is down 94.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China, Hong Kong SAR data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.