Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR

China, Hong Kong SAR: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity was 120 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
120 t
Change on year
up 1,233.3%
World rank
100th
of 130 countries
All-time high
3,172 t
in 1973
All-time low
3 t
in 1989
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR, 1961–2013

01.0k2.0k3.0k196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

In 2013, wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR stood at 120 t.

That represents a change of up 1,233.3% on the previous year and down 94.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR peaked at 3,172 t in 1973 and was at its lowest, 3 t, in 1989.

That places China, Hong Kong SAR 100th out of 130 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR, year by year

Annual values for Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR, 1961 to 2013.
Year t Change
1961 50 t
1962 100 t +100.0%
1963 430 t +330.0%
1964 590 t +37.2%
1965 770 t +30.5%
1966 924 t +20.0%
1967 1,349 t +46.0%
1968 1,679 t +24.5%
1969 2,019 t +20.3%
1970 2,829 t +40.1%
1971 1,564 t -44.7%
1972 1,421 t -9.1%
1973 3,172 t +123.2%
1974 1,021 t -67.8%
1975 1,665 t +63.1%
1976 2,671 t +60.4%
1977 2,241 t -16.1%
1978 2,160 t -3.6%
1979 2,742 t +26.9%
1980 2,792 t +1.8%
1981 1,031 t -63.1%
1982 834 t -19.1%
1983 1,935 t +132.0%
1984 1,447 t -25.2%
1985 1,904 t +31.6%
1986 2,730 t +43.4%
1987 1,851 t -32.2%
1988 1,775 t -4.1%
1989 3 t -99.8%
1990 614 t +20366.7%
1991 302 t -50.8%
1992 982 t +225.2%
1993 955 t -2.7%
1994 1,058 t +10.8%
1995 1,314 t +24.2%
1996 1,882 t +43.2%
1997 481 t -74.4%
1998 180 t -62.6%
1999 84 t -53.3%
2000 1,979 t +2256.0%
2001 1,515 t -23.4%
2002 1,599 t +5.5%
2003 2,254 t +41.0%
2004 1,973 t -12.5%
2005 2,083 t +5.6%
2006 2,199 t +5.6%
2007 993 t -54.8%
2008 320 t -67.8%
2009 127 t -60.3%
2010 427 t +236.2%
2011 595 t +39.3%
2012 9 t -98.5%
2013 120 t +1233.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 879 t 50 t 2,019 t 9
1970s 2,149 t 1,021 t 3,172 t 10
1980s 1,630 t 3 t 2,792 t 10
1990s 785.2 t 84 t 1,882 t 10
2000s 1,504 t 127 t 2,254 t 10
2010s 287.75 t 9 t 595 t 4

Countries ranked near China, Hong Kong SAR

  1. 97 United Arab Emirates 212 t compare
  2. 98 Finland 154 t compare
  3. 99 Cyprus 124 t compare
  4. 101 Burkina Faso 38 t compare
  5. 102 Malta 35 t compare
  6. 103 Panama 23 t compare

See the full ranking of 169 places →

More agriculture & rural data for China, Hong Kong SAR

All data for China, Hong Kong SAR →

Frequently asked questions

What is wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR?
Wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR was 120 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
The highest recorded value was 3,172 t in 1973.
What is the lowest wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
The lowest recorded value was 3 t in 1989.
How does China, Hong Kong SAR rank for wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 100th out of 130 countries with data for 2013.
Is wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity rising or falling in China, Hong Kong SAR?
Over the last ten years it is down 94.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this China, Hong Kong SAR data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/wool-clean-eq-domestic-supply-quantity/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/wool-clean-eq-domestic-supply-quantity/china-hong-kong-sar/">Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity in China, Hong Kong SAR</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 7,903 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.