Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Iceland
Iceland: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Iceland, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Iceland is 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 18.0% on the previous year and down 23.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Iceland peaked at 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1963.
Iceland ranks 136th of 148 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Iceland, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1964 | 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1967 | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 1973 | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1976 | 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1977 | 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1978 | 0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1981 | 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +33.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1986 | 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1988 | 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1989 | 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1990 | 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1991 | 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +66.4% |
| 1992 | 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -41.3% |
| 1993 | 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1994 | 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +34.2% |
| 1995 | 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1996 | 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1997 | 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2000 | 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2003 | 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2004 | 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2005 | 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2007 | 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2008 | 0.0077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2009 | 0.007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2011 | 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2014 | 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.0064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2017 | 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2018 | 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2020 | 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2021 | 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 2023 | 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Iceland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | +66.4% | 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Iceland
- 133 Liberia 0.0176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 134 Sweden 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Zambia 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 137 Somalia 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 138 Congo 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Namibia 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Iceland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 19.96 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0365 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 3,593 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.8983 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0578 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Iceland?
- Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Iceland was 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Iceland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Iceland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does Iceland rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Iceland ranks 136th out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Iceland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Iceland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.