Iceland vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Iceland
0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
136th
Zambia rank
135th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Iceland
  • Zambia
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 2.9 times Iceland's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 136th and Zambia ranks 135th of 148 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0186 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Iceland or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Iceland and Zambia?
0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Zambia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Iceland ranks 136th and Zambia ranks 135th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/zambia/">Iceland vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.