Iceland vs Namibia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Iceland
0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
136th
Namibia rank
139th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Iceland
  • Namibia
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 139th of 148 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Iceland or Namibia?
Iceland, at 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Iceland and Namibia?
0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Iceland ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 139th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.