Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Libya
Libya: Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.0061 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Libya, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Libya is 0.0061 ha per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 1.3% on the previous year and up 3.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Libya peaked at 0.0094 ha per square kilometre in 1980 and was at its lowest, 0.0023 ha per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Libya 111th out of 148 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Libya, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0023 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0026 ha per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1963 | 0.0025 ha per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1964 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0033 ha per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0035 ha per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1967 | 0.0038 ha per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1968 | 0.004 ha per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0048 ha per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1970 | 0.0051 ha per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1971 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1972 | 0.009 ha per square kilometre | +53.3% |
| 1973 | 0.0083 ha per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0083 ha per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1975 | 0.0089 ha per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0089 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1977 | 0.007 ha per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 1978 | 0.0081 ha per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0082 ha per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1980 | 0.0094 ha per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1981 | 0.0068 ha per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0076 ha per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1983 | 0.0081 ha per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1984 | 0.0081 ha per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0068 ha per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1986 | 0.0057 ha per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1987 | 0.0053 ha per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0057 ha per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1989 | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0063 ha per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1991 | 0.0065 ha per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1992 | 0.0057 ha per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0064 ha per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1994 | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1995 | 0.0046 ha per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 1996 | 0.0051 ha per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1997 | 0.0068 ha per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0051 ha per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0051 ha per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2000 | 0.0094 ha per square kilometre | +84.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0045 ha per square kilometre | -51.5% |
| 2002 | 0.0057 ha per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2004 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0057 ha per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0057 ha per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2007 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2010 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2011 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2015 | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2016 | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2019 | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2021 | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2022 | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2023 | 0.0061 ha per square kilometre | +1.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0033 ha per square kilometre | 0.0023 ha per square kilometre | 0.0048 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0078 ha per square kilometre | 0.0051 ha per square kilometre | 0.009 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0069 ha per square kilometre | 0.0053 ha per square kilometre | 0.0094 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | 0.0046 ha per square kilometre | 0.0068 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | 0.0045 ha per square kilometre | 0.0094 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | 0.0061 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Libya
- 108 Argentina 0.0071 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Brazil 0.0071 ha per square kilometre compare
- 110 South Africa 0.0067 ha per square kilometre compare
- 112 Malaysia 0.0058 ha per square kilometre compare
- 113 Ecuador 0.0055 ha per square kilometre compare
- 114 Haiti 0.0054 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Libya
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -37.76 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.015 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 96.79 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.835 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1209 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.0% (2019)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Libya?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Libya was 0.0061 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Libya?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0094 ha per square kilometre in 1980.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Libya?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0023 ha per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Libya rank for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Libya ranks 111th out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Libya?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Libya data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.