Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Brazil
Brazil: Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.0071 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Brazil is 0.0071 ha per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 8.6% on the previous year and down 5.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Brazil peaked at 0.0086 ha per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0035 ha per square kilometre, in 1961.
Brazil ranks 109th of 148 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Brazil, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0035 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0042 ha per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0043 ha per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1964 | 0.0046 ha per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1965 | 0.0047 ha per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0046 ha per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0049 ha per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1968 | 0.0053 ha per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0049 ha per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1970 | 0.0054 ha per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1971 | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0056 ha per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1973 | 0.0051 ha per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1974 | 0.0063 ha per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0056 ha per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 1976 | 0.0057 ha per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1977 | 0.0062 ha per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0067 ha per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1979 | 0.0069 ha per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1980 | 0.006 ha per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 1981 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0066 ha per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0062 ha per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0065 ha per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1986 | 0.0061 ha per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0069 ha per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1988 | 0.0075 ha per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0077 ha per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1990 | 0.0073 ha per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1991 | 0.0073 ha per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0062 ha per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1993 | 0.0064 ha per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1994 | 0.0074 ha per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1995 | 0.0074 ha per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0085 ha per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1997 | 0.0078 ha per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0076 ha per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1999 | 0.0079 ha per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2000 | 0.0068 ha per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 2001 | 0.0069 ha per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0075 ha per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2003 | 0.0076 ha per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2004 | 0.0072 ha per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0072 ha per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2006 | 0.007 ha per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2007 | 0.007 ha per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2008 | 0.0073 ha per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0081 ha per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0081 ha per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0086 ha per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0076 ha per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2013 | 0.0075 ha per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2014 | 0.0077 ha per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2015 | 0.0076 ha per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0077 ha per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.0073 ha per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2018 | 0.0069 ha per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0065 ha per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0062 ha per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2021 | 0.0062 ha per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2022 | 0.0065 ha per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2023 | 0.0071 ha per square kilometre | +8.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0046 ha per square kilometre | 0.0035 ha per square kilometre | 0.0053 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0059 ha per square kilometre | 0.0051 ha per square kilometre | 0.0069 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0065 ha per square kilometre | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | 0.0077 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0074 ha per square kilometre | 0.0062 ha per square kilometre | 0.0085 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0073 ha per square kilometre | 0.0068 ha per square kilometre | 0.0081 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0076 ha per square kilometre | 0.0065 ha per square kilometre | 0.0086 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0065 ha per square kilometre | 0.0062 ha per square kilometre | 0.0071 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 106 Somalia 0.0076 ha per square kilometre compare
- 107 Saudi Arabia 0.0073 ha per square kilometre compare
- 108 Argentina 0.0071 ha per square kilometre compare
- 110 South Africa 0.0067 ha per square kilometre compare
- 111 Libya 0.0061 ha per square kilometre compare
- 112 Malaysia 0.0058 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Brazil
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0609 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 652.04 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.95 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1182 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 5.2% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Brazil?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Brazil was 0.0071 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0086 ha per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0035 ha per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Brazil rank for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 109th out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.