Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.0055 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 0.0055 ha per square kilometre for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in 2023.
That represents a change of down 24.5% on the previous year and up 3.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 0.0267 ha per square kilometre in 1993 and was at its lowest, 0.0039 ha per square kilometre, in 1969.
Ecuador ranks 113th of 148 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.005 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0094 ha per square kilometre | +87.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0094 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0102 ha per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0076 ha per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 1966 | 0.0102 ha per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0066 ha per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1968 | 0.0058 ha per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0039 ha per square kilometre | -32.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0042 ha per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0045 ha per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1972 | 0.0062 ha per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 1973 | 0.007 ha per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0074 ha per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0083 ha per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0094 ha per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1977 | 0.0092 ha per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0107 ha per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1979 | 0.0091 ha per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1980 | 0.0093 ha per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0104 ha per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1982 | 0.0084 ha per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0087 ha per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1984 | 0.0135 ha per square kilometre | +54.3% |
| 1985 | 0.015 ha per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1986 | 0.0174 ha per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 1987 | 0.0206 ha per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1988 | 0.0245 ha per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1989 | 0.022 ha per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 1990 | 0.0203 ha per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1991 | 0.0194 ha per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1992 | 0.0258 ha per square kilometre | +33.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0267 ha per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1994 | 0.0208 ha per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 1995 | 0.022 ha per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1996 | 0.0206 ha per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0237 ha per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0254 ha per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0265 ha per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.012 ha per square kilometre | -54.6% |
| 2001 | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | +78.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0117 ha per square kilometre | -45.5% |
| 2003 | 0.0103 ha per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 2004 | 0.013 ha per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0133 ha per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2006 | 0.0124 ha per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2007 | 0.0106 ha per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0102 ha per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2009 | 0.0091 ha per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2010 | 0.0107 ha per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0064 ha per square kilometre | -40.6% |
| 2012 | 0.0124 ha per square kilometre | +94.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0053 ha per square kilometre | -56.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0112 ha per square kilometre | +110.7% |
| 2015 | 0.0094 ha per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0071 ha per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 2017 | 0.0079 ha per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2018 | 0.0062 ha per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 2019 | 0.0056 ha per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2020 | 0.0104 ha per square kilometre | +84.1% |
| 2021 | 0.0066 ha per square kilometre | -36.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0073 ha per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2023 | 0.0055 ha per square kilometre | -24.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0076 ha per square kilometre | 0.0039 ha per square kilometre | 0.0102 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0076 ha per square kilometre | 0.0042 ha per square kilometre | 0.0107 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.015 ha per square kilometre | 0.0084 ha per square kilometre | 0.0245 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0231 ha per square kilometre | 0.0194 ha per square kilometre | 0.0267 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0124 ha per square kilometre | 0.0091 ha per square kilometre | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0082 ha per square kilometre | 0.0053 ha per square kilometre | 0.0124 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0075 ha per square kilometre | 0.0055 ha per square kilometre | 0.0104 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 110 South Africa 0.0067 ha per square kilometre compare
- 111 Libya 0.0061 ha per square kilometre compare
- 112 Malaysia 0.0058 ha per square kilometre compare
- 114 Haiti 0.0054 ha per square kilometre compare
- 115 Slovakia 0.0046 ha per square kilometre compare
- 116 Switzerland 0.0045 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador was 0.0055 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0267 ha per square kilometre in 1993.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0039 ha per square kilometre in 1969.
- How does Ecuador rank for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 113th out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.