Sweeteners, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sweeteners, Other — Stock Variation was 60 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
60 1000 t
Change on year
down 45.9%
Rank
16th
of 29 groups
All-time high
275 1000 t
in 2019
All-time low
-269 1000 t
in 2010
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Sweeteners, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010–2023

-20002002010201620232010: -269 1000 t2011: -8 1000 t2012: 62 1000 t2013: 79 1000 t2014: 124 1000 t2015: 222 1000 t2016: 187 1000 t2017: 230 1000 t2018: 111 1000 t2019: 275 1000 t2020: 191 1000 t2021: 33 1000 t2022: 111 1000 t2023: 60 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, sweeteners, other — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) stood at 60 1000 t.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 45.9% on the previous year and down 24.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sweeteners, other — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 275 1000 t in 2019 and was at its lowest, -269 1000 t, in 2010.

That places Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) 16th out of 29 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Sweeteners, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year

Annual values for Sweeteners, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010 to 2023.
Year 1000 t Change
2010 -269 1000 t
2011 -8 1000 t -97.0%
2012 62 1000 t -875.0%
2013 79 1000 t +27.4%
2014 124 1000 t +57.0%
2015 222 1000 t +79.0%
2016 187 1000 t -15.8%
2017 230 1000 t +23.0%
2018 111 1000 t -51.7%
2019 275 1000 t +147.7%
2020 191 1000 t -30.5%
2021 33 1000 t -82.7%
2022 111 1000 t +236.4%
2023 60 1000 t -45.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 101.3 1000 t -269 1000 t 275 1000 t 10
2020s 98.75 1000 t 33 1000 t 191 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

  1. 15 Eswatini 20 1000 t compare
  2. 16 Barbados 18 1000 t compare
  3. 16 Bangladesh 18 1000 t compare
  4. 16 Colombia 18 1000 t compare
  5. 18 Republic of Moldova -4 1000 t compare
  6. 19 Uzbekistan 17 1000 t compare
  7. 19 Namibia 17 1000 t compare
  8. 19 China, Taiwan Province of 17 1000 t compare
  9. 19 Melanesia -38 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 212 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

All data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is sweeteners, other — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Sweeteners, other — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 60 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sweeteners, other — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 275 1000 t in 2019.
What is the lowest sweeteners, other — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -269 1000 t in 2010.
How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for sweeteners, other — stock variation?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th out of 29 groups with data for 2023.
Is sweeteners, other — stock variation rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 24.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sweeteners, Other — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweeteners, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sweeteners-other-stock-variation/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sweeteners-other-stock-variation/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Sweeteners, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sweeteners, Other — Stock Variation
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 2,888 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.