Statizoid

Sweet potatoes — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sweet potatoes — Stock Variation was -234 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
-234 1000 t
Change on year
down 85.7%
Rank
29th
of 30 groups
All-time high
659 1000 t
in 2016
All-time low
-661 1000 t
in 2011
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Sweet potatoes — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

-50005002010201620232010: -492 1000 t2011: -661 1000 t2012: 196 1000 t2013: 419 1000 t2014: -173 1000 t2015: -159 1000 t2016: 659 1000 t2017: 359 1000 t2018: 18 1000 t2019: 131 1000 t2020: 101 1000 t2021: 109 1000 t2022: -126 1000 t2023: -234 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) recorded -234 1000 t for sweet potatoes — stock variation in 2023.

The figure is down 85.7% on the previous year and down 155.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sweet potatoes — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 659 1000 t in 2016 and was at its lowest, -661 1000 t, in 2011.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 29th of 30 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Sweet potatoes — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), year by year

Year 1000 t Change
2010 -492 1000 t —
2011 -661 1000 t +34.3%
2012 196 1000 t -129.7%
2013 419 1000 t +113.8%
2014 -173 1000 t -141.3%
2015 -159 1000 t -8.1%
2016 659 1000 t -514.5%
2017 359 1000 t -45.5%
2018 18 1000 t -95.0%
2019 131 1000 t +627.8%
2020 101 1000 t -22.9%
2021 109 1000 t +7.9%
2022 -126 1000 t -215.6%
2023 -234 1000 t +85.7%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Sweet potatoes — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2019 +627.8% 18 1000 t 131 1000 t

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 29.7 1000 t -661 1000 t 659 1000 t 10
2020s -37.5 1000 t -234 1000 t 109 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 26 Australia 1 1000 t compare
  2. 26 Caribbean 1 1000 t compare
  3. 28 Nauru 0 1000 t
  4. 28 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 1000 t
  5. 28 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t
  6. 28 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  7. 28 Bhutan 0 1000 t
  8. 28 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  9. 28 Qatar 0 1000 t
  10. 28 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  11. 28 Kiribati 0 1000 t
  12. 28 Comoros 0 1000 t compare
  13. 28 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t
  14. 28 Timor-Leste 0 1000 t
  15. 28 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  16. 28 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t
  17. 28 Micronesia 0 1000 t
  18. 28 Samoa 0 1000 t
  19. 28 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  20. 28 Vanuatu 0 1000 t
  21. 28 Grenada 0 1000 t
  22. 28 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  23. 28 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  24. 28 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
  25. 28 Gabon 0 1000 t
  26. 28 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  27. 28 Jordan 0 1000 t
  28. 28 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  29. 28 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t
  30. 28 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  31. 28 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  32. 28 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  33. 28 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  34. 28 Mongolia 0 1000 t
  35. 28 Congo 0 1000 t
  36. 28 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  37. 28 Maldives 0 1000 t
  38. 28 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  39. 28 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  40. 28 Armenia 0 1000 t
  41. 28 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  42. 28 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  43. 28 Mauritius 0 1000 t
  44. 28 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t
  45. 28 Panama 0 1000 t
  46. 28 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t
  47. 28 Oman 0 1000 t
  48. 28 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  49. 28 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  50. 28 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 1000 t
  51. 28 Gambia 0 1000 t
  52. 28 Costa Rica 0 1000 t
  53. 28 Lebanon 0 1000 t
  54. 28 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  55. 28 Algeria 0 1000 t
  56. 28 Paraguay 0 1000 t
  57. 28 Croatia 0 1000 t
  58. 28 Ireland 0 1000 t
  59. 28 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  60. 28 Belgium 0 1000 t
  61. 28 Malta 0 1000 t
  62. 28 Cyprus 0 1000 t
  63. 28 Nicaragua 0 1000 t
  64. 28 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  65. 28 North Macedonia 0 1000 t
  66. 28 Luxembourg 0 1000 t
  67. 28 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t
  68. 28 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  69. 28 El Salvador 0 1000 t
  70. 28 Georgia 0 1000 t
  71. 28 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t
  72. 28 Eswatini 0 1000 t
  73. 28 Estonia 0 1000 t
  74. 28 Belarus 0 1000 t
  75. 28 Montenegro 0 1000 t
  76. 28 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t
  77. 28 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  78. 28 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  79. 28 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  80. 28 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t
  81. 28 Latvia 0 1000 t
  82. 28 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t
  83. 28 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  84. 28 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t
  85. 28 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
  86. 28 Bulgaria 0 1000 t
  87. 28 Slovenia 0 1000 t
  88. 28 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  89. 28 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  90. 28 France 0 1000 t
  91. 28 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  92. 28 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  93. 28 Belize 0 1000 t
  94. 28 Slovakia 0 1000 t
  95. 28 New Caledonia 0 1000 t
  96. 28 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  97. 28 Lithuania 0 1000 t
  98. 28 Namibia 0 1000 t
  99. 28 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  100. 28 Tunisia 0 1000 t
  101. 28 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  102. 28 Yemen 0 1000 t
  103. 28 Romania 0 1000 t
  104. 28 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t compare
  105. 28 Madagascar 0 1000 t compare
  106. 28 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  107. 28 Türkiye 0 1000 t
  108. 28 Germany 0 1000 t
  109. 28 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  110. 28 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t compare
  111. 28 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  112. 28 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  113. 28 Botswana 0 1000 t
  114. 28 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  115. 28 Peru 0 1000 t
  116. 28 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  117. 28 Ethiopia 0 1000 t compare
  118. 28 Colombia 0 1000 t
  119. 28 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  120. 28 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  121. 28 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
  122. 28 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  123. 28 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  124. 28 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  125. 28 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  126. 28 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  127. 28 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  128. 28 Uganda 0 1000 t
  129. 28 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t
  130. 28 Russian Federation 0 1000 t
  131. 28 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t compare
  132. 28 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  133. 28 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
  134. 28 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  135. 28 Ukraine 0 1000 t
  136. 28 Nauru 0 1000 t
  137. 28 East Timor 0 1000 t
  138. 28 Syria 0 1000 t
  139. 28 United Kingdom 0 1000 t
  140. 28 Moldova 0 1000 t
  141. 28 Turkey 0 1000 t
  142. 28 Cote d'Ivoire 0 1000 t compare
  143. 28 Russia 0 1000 t

See the full ranking of 211 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is sweet potatoes — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Sweet potatoes — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was -234 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sweet potatoes — stock variation recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 659 1000 t in 2016.
What is the lowest sweet potatoes — stock variation recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -661 1000 t in 2011.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for sweet potatoes — stock variation?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 29th out of 30 groups with data for 2023.
Is sweet potatoes — stock variation rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 155.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sweet potatoes — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweet potatoes — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sweet-potatoes-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sweet-potatoes-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Sweet potatoes — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sweet potatoes — Stock Variation
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
211 places, 2,772 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.