Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Other uses was 285 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
285 1000 t
Change on year
down 17.2%
Rank
11th
of 27 groups
All-time high
344 1000 t
in 2022
All-time low
77 1000 t
in 2013
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010–2023

1002003002010201620232010: 96 1000 t2011: 112 1000 t2012: 92 1000 t2013: 77 1000 t2014: 110 1000 t2015: 119 1000 t2016: 106 1000 t2017: 147 1000 t2018: 116 1000 t2019: 223 1000 t2020: 329 1000 t2021: 208 1000 t2022: 344 1000 t2023: 285 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for sugar (raw equivalent) — other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) is 285 1000 t, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 17.2% on the previous year and up 270.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sugar (raw equivalent) — other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 344 1000 t in 2022 and was at its lowest, 77 1000 t, in 2013.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 27 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year

Annual values for Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Other uses (non-food) in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010 to 2023.
Year 1000 t Change
2010 96 1000 t
2011 112 1000 t +16.7%
2012 92 1000 t -17.9%
2013 77 1000 t -16.3%
2014 110 1000 t +42.9%
2015 119 1000 t +8.2%
2016 106 1000 t -10.9%
2017 147 1000 t +38.7%
2018 116 1000 t -21.1%
2019 223 1000 t +92.2%
2020 329 1000 t +47.5%
2021 208 1000 t -36.8%
2022 344 1000 t +65.4%
2023 285 1000 t -17.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 119.8 1000 t 77 1000 t 223 1000 t 10
2020s 291.5 1000 t 208 1000 t 344 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

  1. 8 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 115 1000 t compare
  2. 9 Nicaragua 58 1000 t compare
  3. 10 Denmark 40 1000 t compare
  4. 10 Sri Lanka 40 1000 t compare
  5. 12 Bosnia and Herzegovina 32 1000 t compare
  6. 12 El Salvador 32 1000 t compare
  7. 14 Egypt 29 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 115 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

All data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is sugar (raw equivalent) — other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Sugar (raw equivalent) — other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 285 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sugar (raw equivalent) — other uses recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 344 1000 t in 2022.
What is the lowest sugar (raw equivalent) — other uses recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was 77 1000 t in 2013.
How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for sugar (raw equivalent) — other uses?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th out of 27 groups with data for 2023.
Is sugar (raw equivalent) — other uses rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is up 270.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-raw-equivalent-other-uses-non-food/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-raw-equivalent-other-uses-non-food/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
115 places, 1,321 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.