Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Namibia

Namibia: Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
0 t
Change on year
down 100.0%
World rank
101st
of 137 countries
All-time high
8 t
in 2010
All-time low
0 t
in 1961
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Namibia, 1961–2013

02468196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for soft-fibres, other — other uses in Namibia is 0 t, measured in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, soft-fibres, other — other uses in Namibia peaked at 8 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.

Namibia ranks 101st of 137 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Namibia, year by year

Annual values for Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food) in Namibia, 1961 to 2013.
Year t Change
1961 0 t
1962 0 t
1963 0 t
1964 0 t
1965 0 t
1966 0 t
1967 0 t
1968 0 t
1969 0 t
1970 0 t
1971 0 t
1972 0 t
1973 0 t
1974 0 t
1975 0 t
1976 0 t
1977 0 t
1978 0 t
1979 0 t
1980 0 t
1981 0 t
1982 0 t
1983 0 t
1984 0 t
1985 0 t
1986 0 t
1987 0 t
1988 0 t
1989 0 t
1990 0 t
1991 0 t
1992 0 t
1993 0 t
1994 0 t
1995 0 t
1996 0 t
1997 0 t
1998 0 t
1999 0 t
2000 0 t
2001 0 t
2002 0 t
2003 3 t
2004 3 t +0.0%
2005 3 t +0.0%
2006 3 t +0.0%
2007 3 t +0.0%
2008 3 t +0.0%
2009 3 t +0.0%
2010 8 t +166.7%
2011 8 t +0.0%
2012 1 t -87.5%
2013 0 t -100.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t 9
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t 10
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t 10
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t 10
2000s 2.1 t 0 t 3 t 10
2010s 4.25 t 0 t 8 t 4

Countries ranked near Namibia

  1. 101 Azerbaijan 0 t compare
  2. 101 Bangladesh 0 t compare
  3. 101 Barbados 0 t compare
  4. 101 Benin 0 t compare
  5. 101 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
  6. 101 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
  7. 101 Colombia 0 t compare
  8. 101 Costa Rica 0 t compare
  9. 101 Cyprus 0 t compare
  10. 101 Djibouti 0 t compare
  11. 101 Dominican Republic 0 t compare
  12. 101 Ecuador 0 t compare
  13. 101 El Salvador 0 t compare
  14. 101 Fiji 0 t compare
  15. 101 French Polynesia 0 t compare
  16. 101 Gambia 0 t compare
  17. 101 Ghana 0 t compare
  18. 101 Grenada 0 t compare
  19. 101 Guyana 0 t compare
  20. 101 Haiti 0 t compare
  21. 101 Kenya 0 t compare
  22. 101 Kyrgyzstan 0 t compare
  23. 101 Malta 0 t compare
  24. 101 Mauritania 0 t compare
  25. 101 Mauritius 0 t compare
  26. 101 Myanmar 0 t compare
  27. 101 Nicaragua 0 t compare
  28. 101 Panama 0 t compare
  29. 101 Paraguay 0 t compare
  30. 101 Suriname 0 t compare
  31. 101 Togo 0 t compare
  32. 101 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
  33. 101 Turkmenistan 0 t compare
  34. 101 Uganda 0 t compare
  35. 101 Yemen 0 t compare
  36. 101 Zimbabwe 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 178 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Namibia

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is soft-fibres, other — other uses in Namibia?
Soft-fibres, other — other uses in Namibia was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest soft-fibres, other — other uses recorded in Namibia?
The highest recorded value was 8 t in 2010.
What is the lowest soft-fibres, other — other uses recorded in Namibia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
How does Namibia rank for soft-fibres, other — other uses?
Namibia ranks 101st out of 137 countries with data for 2013.
Is soft-fibres, other — other uses rising or falling in Namibia?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Namibia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Namibia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/soft-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/soft-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/namibia/">Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Namibia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
178 places, 8,520 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.