Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Colombia
Colombia: Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Colombia, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, soft-fibres, other — other uses in Colombia stood at 0 t. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, soft-fibres, other — other uses in Colombia peaked at 454 t in 1991 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 2013.
That places Colombia 101st out of 137 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Colombia, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 50 t | — |
| 1962 | 49 t | -2.0% |
| 1963 | 80 t | +63.3% |
| 1964 | 118 t | +47.5% |
| 1965 | 10 t | -91.5% |
| 1966 | 33 t | +230.0% |
| 1967 | 40 t | +21.2% |
| 1968 | 44 t | +10.0% |
| 1969 | 51 t | +15.9% |
| 1970 | 90 t | +76.5% |
| 1971 | 42 t | -53.3% |
| 1972 | 21 t | -50.0% |
| 1973 | 19 t | -9.5% |
| 1974 | 28 t | +47.4% |
| 1975 | 41 t | +46.4% |
| 1976 | 48 t | +17.1% |
| 1977 | 25 t | -47.9% |
| 1978 | 34 t | +36.0% |
| 1979 | 38 t | +11.8% |
| 1980 | 26 t | -31.6% |
| 1981 | 70 t | +169.2% |
| 1982 | 44 t | -37.1% |
| 1983 | 43 t | -2.3% |
| 1984 | 34 t | -20.9% |
| 1985 | 27 t | -20.6% |
| 1986 | 70 t | +159.3% |
| 1987 | 31 t | -55.7% |
| 1988 | 74 t | +138.7% |
| 1989 | 209 t | +182.4% |
| 1990 | 141 t | -32.5% |
| 1991 | 454 t | +222.0% |
| 1992 | 185 t | -59.3% |
| 1993 | 127 t | -31.4% |
| 1994 | 272 t | +114.2% |
| 1995 | 92 t | -66.2% |
| 1996 | 47 t | -48.9% |
| 1997 | 62 t | +31.9% |
| 1998 | 36 t | -41.9% |
| 1999 | 4 t | -88.9% |
| 2000 | 30 t | +650.0% |
| 2001 | 2 t | -93.3% |
| 2002 | 39 t | +1850.0% |
| 2003 | 7 t | -82.1% |
| 2004 | 23 t | +228.6% |
| 2005 | 27 t | +17.4% |
| 2006 | 51 t | +88.9% |
| 2007 | 57 t | +11.8% |
| 2008 | 10 t | -82.5% |
| 2009 | 22 t | +120.0% |
| 2010 | 20 t | -9.1% |
| 2011 | 30 t | +50.0% |
| 2012 | 11 t | -63.3% |
| 2013 | 0 t | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 52.78 t | 10 t | 118 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 38.6 t | 19 t | 90 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 62.8 t | 26 t | 209 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 142 t | 4 t | 454 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 26.8 t | 2 t | 57 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 15.25 t | 0 t | 30 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Colombia
- 101 Azerbaijan 0 t compare
- 101 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 101 Barbados 0 t compare
- 101 Benin 0 t compare
- 101 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 101 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
- 101 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 101 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 101 Djibouti 0 t compare
- 101 Dominican Republic 0 t compare
- 101 Ecuador 0 t compare
- 101 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 101 Fiji 0 t compare
- 101 French Polynesia 0 t compare
- 101 Gambia 0 t compare
- 101 Ghana 0 t compare
- 101 Grenada 0 t compare
- 101 Guyana 0 t compare
- 101 Haiti 0 t compare
- 101 Kenya 0 t compare
- 101 Kyrgyzstan 0 t compare
- 101 Malta 0 t compare
- 101 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 101 Mauritius 0 t compare
- 101 Myanmar 0 t compare
- 101 Namibia 0 t compare
- 101 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 101 Panama 0 t compare
- 101 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 101 Suriname 0 t compare
- 101 Togo 0 t compare
- 101 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 101 Turkmenistan 0 t compare
- 101 Uganda 0 t compare
- 101 Yemen 0 t compare
- 101 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Colombia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 13.93 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0995 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 851.52 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.2113 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2122 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 5.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is soft-fibres, other — other uses in Colombia?
- Soft-fibres, other — other uses in Colombia was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest soft-fibres, other — other uses recorded in Colombia?
- The highest recorded value was 454 t in 1991.
- What is the lowest soft-fibres, other — other uses recorded in Colombia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 2013.
- How does Colombia rank for soft-fibres, other — other uses?
- Colombia ranks 101st out of 137 countries with data for 2013.
- Is soft-fibres, other — other uses rising or falling in Colombia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Colombia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.