Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square in Ecuador
Ecuador: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square was 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in 2023.
The figure is down 19.4% on the previous year and up 293.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Ecuador peaked at 0.6287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1980 and was at its lowest, 0.0481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 2011.
Ecuador ranks 40th of 102 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1638 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1612 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1963 | 0.1588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1964 | 0.1524 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1965 | 0.1976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 1966 | 0.194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1967 | 0.2142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1968 | 0.1687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 1969 | 0.1825 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1970 | 0.1802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1971 | 0.2037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1972 | 0.1804 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1973 | 0.1693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1974 | 0.2801 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +65.4% |
| 1975 | 0.2946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1976 | 0.3536 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1977 | 0.6126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +73.3% |
| 1978 | 0.5873 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1979 | 0.5936 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1980 | 0.6287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1981 | 0.619 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1982 | 0.5898 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1983 | 0.4185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -29.0% |
| 1984 | 0.3205 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 1985 | 0.2719 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1986 | 0.0816 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -70.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0915 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1988 | 0.1022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1989 | 0.0842 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1990 | 0.0908 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1991 | 0.0905 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0898 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1993 | 0.0994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1994 | 0.1043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1995 | 0.1015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1996 | 0.1077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1997 | 0.2553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +137.1% |
| 1998 | 0.1599 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -37.4% |
| 1999 | 0.1599 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.1962 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 2001 | 0.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2002 | 0.144 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 2004 | 0.1641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +83.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0866 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -47.3% |
| 2006 | 0.0755 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 2007 | 0.0736 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2010 | 0.0624 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2011 | 0.0481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 2013 | 0.0552 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2014 | 0.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +171.6% |
| 2015 | 0.1534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2016 | 0.099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 2017 | 0.1873 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +89.2% |
| 2018 | 0.1355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 2019 | 0.1756 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 2020 | 0.192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2021 | 0.1542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2022 | 0.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +75.1% |
| 2023 | 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.1795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 1.2× the median. (37 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.2272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 96% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | +171.6% | 0.0552 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1997 | +137.1% | 0.1077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1524 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.6126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0816 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.6287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0898 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1873 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 37 Montenegro 0.2343 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Paraguay 0.2272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Colombia 0.2221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Guinea 0.2026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Uruguay 0.196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Panama 0.1843 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Ecuador?
- Oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Ecuador was 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- What is the lowest oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- How does Ecuador rank for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Ecuador ranks 40th out of 102 countries with data for 2023.
- Is oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 293.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Oranges — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.