Ecuador vs Panama: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Ecuador
0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.1843 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
40th
Panama rank
43rd

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Panama
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1843 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.0333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Ecuador ranks 40th and Panama ranks 43rd of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Panama in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0.3455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.266 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.3208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1475 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1733 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.1259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1183 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.1166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1808 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0642 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1893 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0.2085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Ecuador or Panama?
Ecuador, at 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1843 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Ecuador and Panama?
0.0333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Panama rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Ecuador ranks 40th and Panama ranks 43rd of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Panama: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/panama/">Ecuador vs Panama: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.