Ecuador vs Uruguay: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Ecuador
0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
40th
Uruguay rank
42nd

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.3455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0784 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2671 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.3208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1374 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1834 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.1259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2672 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1413 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.1166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2665 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1499 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.2085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Ecuador or Uruguay?
Ecuador, at 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Ecuador and Uruguay?
0.0216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Uruguay rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Ecuador ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Uruguay: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/uruguay/">Ecuador vs Uruguay: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.