Okra — Gross Production Value in Asia
Asia: Okra — Gross Production Value was 7.62 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Okra — Gross Production Value in Asia, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Asia recorded 7.62 million 1000 Int$ for okra — gross production value in 2024. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.
The figure is up 2.2% on the previous year and up 17.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, okra — gross production value in Asia peaked at 7.62 million 1000 Int$ in 2024 and was at its lowest, 745,705 1000 Int$, in 1961.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Okra — Gross Production Value in Asia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 745,705 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 759,855 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1963 | 793,887 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1964 | 812,786 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1965 | 865,925 1000 Int$ | +6.5% |
| 1966 | 903,902 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1967 | 932,353 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 1968 | 961,027 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 1969 | 1.01 million 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1970 | 1.11 million 1000 Int$ | +9.6% |
| 1971 | 1.14 million 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1972 | 1.19 million 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1973 | 1.29 million 1000 Int$ | +8.4% |
| 1974 | 1.34 million 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 1975 | 1.39 million 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1976 | 1.42 million 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1977 | 1.48 million 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1978 | 1.58 million 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 1979 | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1980 | 1.77 million 1000 Int$ | +6.9% |
| 1981 | 1.83 million 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 1982 | 1.89 million 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 1983 | 1.98 million 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 1984 | 2.05 million 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1985 | 2.12 million 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 1986 | 2.19 million 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 1987 | 2.26 million 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 1988 | 2.34 million 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 1989 | 2.41 million 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 1990 | 2.48 million 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1991 | 2.51 million 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1992 | 2.62 million 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1993 | 2.65 million 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1994 | 3.25 million 1000 Int$ | +22.7% |
| 1995 | 4.09 million 1000 Int$ | +26.0% |
| 1996 | 4.01 million 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 1997 | 3.90 million 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 1998 | 3.43 million 1000 Int$ | -12.1% |
| 1999 | 3.57 million 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 2000 | 3.57 million 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 2001 | 3.53 million 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 2002 | 3.54 million 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2003 | 3.76 million 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 2004 | 3.90 million 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 2005 | 3.78 million 1000 Int$ | -3.2% |
| 2006 | 4.26 million 1000 Int$ | +12.8% |
| 2007 | 4.31 million 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 4.43 million 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 2009 | 4.77 million 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 2010 | 5.04 million 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
| 2011 | 5.97 million 1000 Int$ | +18.5% |
| 2012 | 6.39 million 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 2013 | 6.50 million 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2014 | 6.48 million 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2015 | 5.78 million 1000 Int$ | -10.8% |
| 2016 | 5.93 million 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 2017 | 6.16 million 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 6.23 million 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2019 | 6.34 million 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2020 | 6.70 million 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 2021 | 6.82 million 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2022 | 7.25 million 1000 Int$ | +6.3% |
| 2023 | 7.46 million 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 2024 | 7.62 million 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 864,947 1000 Int$ | 745,705 1000 Int$ | 1.01 million 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.36 million 1000 Int$ | 1.11 million 1000 Int$ | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.08 million 1000 Int$ | 1.77 million 1000 Int$ | 2.41 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.25 million 1000 Int$ | 2.48 million 1000 Int$ | 4.09 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.98 million 1000 Int$ | 3.53 million 1000 Int$ | 4.77 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.08 million 1000 Int$ | 5.04 million 1000 Int$ | 6.50 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.17 million 1000 Int$ | 6.70 million 1000 Int$ | 7.62 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Asia
More agriculture & rural data for Asia
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate 2.02 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Production 113.95 million t (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield 43,044 kg/ha (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production 68.35 million t (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing 866.88 million An (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested 2.65 million ha (2024)
- Swine / pigs — Stocks 531.98 million An (2024)
- Unmanufactured tobacco — Production 4.18 million t (2024)
- Unmanufactured tobacco — Area harvested 2.08 million ha (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight 79 kg/An (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is okra — gross production value in Asia?
- Okra — gross production value in Asia was 7.62 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest okra — gross production value recorded in Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 7.62 million 1000 Int$ in 2024.
- What is the lowest okra — gross production value recorded in Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 745,705 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Asia rank for okra — gross production value?
- Asia ranks 1st out of 9 regions with data for 2024.
- Is okra — gross production value rising or falling in Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Okra — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.