How does India rank for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?

India ranks 5th out of 19 countries with data for 2024.

Is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value rising or falling in India?

Over the last ten years it is down 6.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in India

Name: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in India
Creator: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)

India: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value was 71.62 million 1000 SLC in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)

71.62 million 1000 SLC

Change on year

up 3.2%

World rank

5th

of 19 countries

All-time high

77.72 million 1000 SLC

in 2016

All-time low

2.21 million 1000 SLC

in 1961

Years of data

1961–2024

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in India, 1961–2024

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.

Analysis

In 2024, natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in India stood at 71.62 million 1000 SLC.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.2% on the previous year and down 6.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in India peaked at 77.72 million 1000 SLC in 2016 and was at its lowest, 2.21 million 1000 SLC, in 1961.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in India, year by year

Annual values for Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) in India, 1961 to 2024.
Year	1000 SLC	Change
1961	2.21 million 1000 SLC	—
1962	2.56 million 1000 SLC	+16.2%
1963	3.04 million 1000 SLC	+18.6%
1964	3.62 million 1000 SLC	+18.9%
1965	4.04 million 1000 SLC	+11.6%
1966	4.35 million 1000 SLC	+7.7%
1967	5.11 million 1000 SLC	+17.5%
1968	5.63 million 1000 SLC	+10.1%
1969	6.54 million 1000 SLC	+16.1%
1970	7.35 million 1000 SLC	+12.5%
1971	7.54 million 1000 SLC	+2.6%
1972	8.27 million 1000 SLC	+9.8%
1973	9.19 million 1000 SLC	+11.1%
1974	10.24 million 1000 SLC	+11.4%
1975	10.64 million 1000 SLC	+3.9%
1976	11.27 million 1000 SLC	+5.9%
1977	12.23 million 1000 SLC	+8.6%
1978	12.02 million 1000 SLC	-1.7%
1979	11.07 million 1000 SLC	-7.9%
1980	12.13 million 1000 SLC	+9.6%
1981	12.52 million 1000 SLC	+3.2%
1982	12.50 million 1000 SLC	-0.1%
1983	13.56 million 1000 SLC	+8.5%
1984	14.33 million 1000 SLC	+5.7%
1985	15.25 million 1000 SLC	+6.4%
1986	16.39 million 1000 SLC	+7.5%
1987	17.95 million 1000 SLC	+9.5%
1988	19.23 million 1000 SLC	+7.2%
1989	21.19 million 1000 SLC	+10.2%
1990	24.31 million 1000 SLC	+14.7%
1991	26.95 million 1000 SLC	+10.9%
1992	29.98 million 1000 SLC	+11.3%
1993	30.01 million 1000 SLC	+0.1%
1994	32.21 million 1000 SLC	+7.4%
1995	38.59 million 1000 SLC	+19.8%
1996	41.45 million 1000 SLC	+7.4%
1997	44.97 million 1000 SLC	+8.5%
1998	49.46 million 1000 SLC	+10.0%
1999	50.85 million 1000 SLC	+2.8%
2000	51.51 million 1000 SLC	+1.3%
2001	51.59 million 1000 SLC	+0.2%
2002	53.10 million 1000 SLC	+2.9%
2003	58.18 million 1000 SLC	+9.6%
2004	61.29 million 1000 SLC	+5.3%
2005	65.62 million 1000 SLC	+7.1%
2006	69.73 million 1000 SLC	+6.3%
2007	67.48 million 1000 SLC	-3.2%
2008	70.68 million 1000 SLC	+4.7%
2009	67.97 million 1000 SLC	-3.8%
2010	70.48 million 1000 SLC	+3.7%
2011	65.41 million 1000 SLC	-7.2%
2012	73.58 million 1000 SLC	+12.5%
2013	73.58 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2014	76.85 million 1000 SLC	+4.4%
2015	77.22 million 1000 SLC	+0.5%
2016	77.72 million 1000 SLC	+0.6%
2017	58.29 million 1000 SLC	-25.0%
2018	53.96 million 1000 SLC	-7.4%
2019	57.40 million 1000 SLC	+6.4%
2020	56.01 million 1000 SLC	-2.4%
2021	61.24 million 1000 SLC	+9.3%
2022	68.92 million 1000 SLC	+12.6%
2023	69.41 million 1000 SLC	+0.7%
2024	71.62 million 1000 SLC	+3.2%

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1960s	4.12 million 1000 SLC	2.21 million 1000 SLC	6.54 million 1000 SLC	9
1970s	9.98 million 1000 SLC	7.35 million 1000 SLC	12.23 million 1000 SLC	10
1980s	15.51 million 1000 SLC	12.13 million 1000 SLC	21.19 million 1000 SLC	10
1990s	36.88 million 1000 SLC	24.31 million 1000 SLC	50.85 million 1000 SLC	10
2000s	61.72 million 1000 SLC	51.51 million 1000 SLC	70.68 million 1000 SLC	10
2010s	68.45 million 1000 SLC	53.96 million 1000 SLC	77.72 million 1000 SLC	10
2020s	65.44 million 1000 SLC	56.01 million 1000 SLC	71.62 million 1000 SLC	5

Countries ranked near India

2 Cambodia 876.40 million 1000 SLC compare
3 Myanmar 486.01 million 1000 SLC compare
4 Thailand 234.52 million 1000 SLC compare
6 Cameroon 62.45 million 1000 SLC compare
7 Guinea 40.83 million 1000 SLC compare
8 China, mainland 19.62 million 1000 SLC compare

See the full ranking of 22 places →

More agriculture & rural data for India

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.83 % change on previous year (2025)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1623 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 438.73 current US$ per person (2025)
Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4067 % change on previous year (2025)
Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Rural population, per capita 0.6431 units per person (2025)
Agriculture share gdp 16.23 (2025)
Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 16.23 (2025)
Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
Agricultural raw materials imports 1.5% (2024)

All data for India →

Frequently asked questions

What is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in India?: Natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in India was 71.62 million 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in India?: The highest recorded value was 77.72 million 1000 SLC in 2016.
What is the lowest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in India?: The lowest recorded value was 2.21 million 1000 SLC in 1961.
How does India rank for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?: India ranks 5th out of 19 countries with data for 2024.
Is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value rising or falling in India?: Over the last ten years it is down 6.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this India data come from?: The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in India. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc/india/">Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in India</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)
Unit: 1000 SLC
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 22 places, 1,286 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.