How does Myanmar rank for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?

Myanmar ranks 3rd out of 19 countries with data for 2024.

Is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value rising or falling in Myanmar?

Over the last ten years it is up 69.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Myanmar

Name: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Myanmar
Creator: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)

Myanmar: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value was 486.01 million 1000 SLC in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)

486.01 million 1000 SLC

Change on year

up 2.5%

World rank

3rd

of 19 countries

All-time high

486.01 million 1000 SLC

in 2024

All-time low

16.55 million 1000 SLC

in 1967

Years of data

1961–2024

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Myanmar, 1961–2024

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.

Analysis

In 2024, natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Myanmar stood at 486.01 million 1000 SLC. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.

That represents a change of up 2.5% on the previous year and up 69.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Myanmar peaked at 486.01 million 1000 SLC in 2024 and was at its lowest, 16.55 million 1000 SLC, in 1967.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Myanmar, year by year

Annual values for Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) in Myanmar, 1961 to 2024.
Year	1000 SLC	Change
1961	19.44 million 1000 SLC	—
1962	22.19 million 1000 SLC	+14.2%
1963	20.93 million 1000 SLC	-5.7%
1964	19.70 million 1000 SLC	-5.9%
1965	19.41 million 1000 SLC	-1.5%
1966	17.43 million 1000 SLC	-10.2%
1967	16.55 million 1000 SLC	-5.1%
1968	17.82 million 1000 SLC	+7.7%
1969	17.97 million 1000 SLC	+0.8%
1970	18.99 million 1000 SLC	+5.6%
1971	19.74 million 1000 SLC	+4.0%
1972	20.77 million 1000 SLC	+5.2%
1973	22.37 million 1000 SLC	+7.7%
1974	22.69 million 1000 SLC	+1.4%
1975	22.30 million 1000 SLC	-1.7%
1976	21.36 million 1000 SLC	-4.2%
1977	21.98 million 1000 SLC	+2.9%
1978	22.10 million 1000 SLC	+0.5%
1979	22.72 million 1000 SLC	+2.8%
1980	23.08 million 1000 SLC	+1.6%
1981	23.30 million 1000 SLC	+1.0%
1982	23.58 million 1000 SLC	+1.2%
1983	25.17 million 1000 SLC	+6.7%
1984	23.19 million 1000 SLC	-7.9%
1985	22.88 million 1000 SLC	-1.3%
1986	22.17 million 1000 SLC	-3.1%
1987	22.12 million 1000 SLC	-0.3%
1988	21.90 million 1000 SLC	-1.0%
1989	21.15 million 1000 SLC	-3.4%
1990	21.78 million 1000 SLC	+3.0%
1991	21.92 million 1000 SLC	+0.6%
1992	22.51 million 1000 SLC	+2.7%
1993	23.54 million 1000 SLC	+4.6%
1994	39.88 million 1000 SLC	+69.4%
1995	37.23 million 1000 SLC	-6.6%
1996	37.67 million 1000 SLC	+1.2%
1997	39.14 million 1000 SLC	+3.9%
1998	33.25 million 1000 SLC	-15.0%
1999	38.55 million 1000 SLC	+15.9%
2000	51.65 million 1000 SLC	+34.0%
2001	53.27 million 1000 SLC	+3.1%
2002	57.53 million 1000 SLC	+8.0%
2003	57.68 million 1000 SLC	+0.3%
2004	75.78 million 1000 SLC	+31.4%
2005	92.99 million 1000 SLC	+22.7%
2006	105.94 million 1000 SLC	+13.9%
2007	128.31 million 1000 SLC	+21.1%
2008	135.08 million 1000 SLC	+5.3%
2009	162.30 million 1000 SLC	+20.2%
2010	185.69 million 1000 SLC	+14.4%
2011	216.74 million 1000 SLC	+16.7%
2012	238.07 million 1000 SLC	+9.8%
2013	256.17 million 1000 SLC	+7.6%
2014	286.78 million 1000 SLC	+11.9%
2015	307.14 million 1000 SLC	+7.1%
2016	326.17 million 1000 SLC	+6.2%
2017	350.24 million 1000 SLC	+7.4%
2018	405.36 million 1000 SLC	+15.7%
2019	389.84 million 1000 SLC	-3.8%
2020	403.56 million 1000 SLC	+3.5%
2021	416.96 million 1000 SLC	+3.3%
2022	457.26 million 1000 SLC	+9.7%
2023	474.09 million 1000 SLC	+3.7%
2024	486.01 million 1000 SLC	+2.5%

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1960s	19.05 million 1000 SLC	16.55 million 1000 SLC	22.19 million 1000 SLC	9
1970s	21.50 million 1000 SLC	18.99 million 1000 SLC	22.72 million 1000 SLC	10
1980s	22.86 million 1000 SLC	21.15 million 1000 SLC	25.17 million 1000 SLC	10
1990s	31.55 million 1000 SLC	21.78 million 1000 SLC	39.88 million 1000 SLC	10
2000s	92.05 million 1000 SLC	51.65 million 1000 SLC	162.30 million 1000 SLC	10
2010s	296.22 million 1000 SLC	185.69 million 1000 SLC	405.36 million 1000 SLC	10
2020s	447.58 million 1000 SLC	403.56 million 1000 SLC	486.01 million 1000 SLC	5

Countries ranked near Myanmar

1 Indonesia 15.46 billion 1000 SLC compare
2 Cambodia 876.40 million 1000 SLC compare
4 Thailand 234.52 million 1000 SLC compare
5 India 71.62 million 1000 SLC compare
6 Cameroon 62.45 million 1000 SLC compare

See the full ranking of 22 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Myanmar

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.26 % change on previous year (2025)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.253 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 376.69 current US$ per person (2025)
Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4495 % change on previous year (2025)
Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Rural population, per capita 0.6942 units per person (2025)
Agriculture share gdp 25.3 (2025)
Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 25.3 (2025)
Agricultural raw materials exports 3.3% (2024)
Agricultural raw materials imports 0.5% (2024)

All data for Myanmar →

Frequently asked questions

What is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Myanmar?: Natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Myanmar was 486.01 million 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Myanmar?: The highest recorded value was 486.01 million 1000 SLC in 2024.
What is the lowest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Myanmar?: The lowest recorded value was 16.55 million 1000 SLC in 1967.
How does Myanmar rank for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?: Myanmar ranks 3rd out of 19 countries with data for 2024.
Is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value rising or falling in Myanmar?: Over the last ten years it is up 69.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Myanmar data come from?: The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Myanmar. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc/myanmar/">Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Myanmar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)
Unit: 1000 SLC
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 22 places, 1,286 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.