Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) was 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Ecuador stood at 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 0.4% on the previous year and up 4.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Ecuador peaked at 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Ecuador 93rd out of 117 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1966 | 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1968 | 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1978 | 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1981 | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1986 | 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1987 | 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -29.1% |
| 1991 | 0.0092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1992 | 0.0094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1994 | 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1995 | 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1998 | 0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1999 | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2000 | 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 2001 | 0.0115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2003 | 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2004 | 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2005 | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2012 | 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2018 | 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2019 | 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2022 | 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 16% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 24% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | -29.1% | 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 90 Ireland 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Egypt 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 92 Jordan 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 94 Panama 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Belize 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 96 Saudi Arabia 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Ecuador?
- Natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Ecuador was 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- What is the lowest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
- Ecuador ranks 93rd out of 117 countries with data for 2023.
- Is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Natural honey — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.