Ecuador vs Egypt: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Ecuador
0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt
0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
93rd
Egypt rank
91st

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 93rd and Egypt ranks 91st of 117 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Egypt Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0376 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0253 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Ecuador or Egypt?
Egypt, at 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Ecuador and Egypt?
0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Egypt?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Egypt rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Ecuador ranks 93rd and Egypt ranks 91st of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Egypt: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/egypt-arab-rep/">Ecuador vs Egypt: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.