Ecuador vs Jordan: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Ecuador
0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
93rd
Jordan rank
92nd

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Jordan
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 93rd and Jordan ranks 92nd of 117 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Ecuador or Jordan?
Jordan, at 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Ecuador and Jordan?
0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Jordan rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Ecuador ranks 93rd and Jordan ranks 92nd of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Jordan: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jordan/">Ecuador vs Jordan: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.