Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value in Mauritius
Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value was 0 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value in Mauritius, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Mauritius recorded 0 1000 Int$ for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 64 years on record.
Over the whole period, meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value in Mauritius peaked at 348 1000 Int$ in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 Int$, in 1970.
Mauritius ranks 172nd of 179 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 130 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 47 1000 Int$ | -63.8% |
| 1963 | 108 1000 Int$ | +129.8% |
| 1964 | 167 1000 Int$ | +54.6% |
| 1965 | 117 1000 Int$ | -29.9% |
| 1966 | 30 1000 Int$ | -74.4% |
| 1967 | 24 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 1968 | 22 1000 Int$ | -8.3% |
| 1969 | 99 1000 Int$ | +350.0% |
| 1970 | 0 1000 Int$ | -100.0% |
| 1971 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1972 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1973 | 44 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1974 | 183 1000 Int$ | +315.9% |
| 1975 | 64 1000 Int$ | -65.0% |
| 1976 | 38 1000 Int$ | -40.6% |
| 1977 | 125 1000 Int$ | +228.9% |
| 1978 | 39 1000 Int$ | -68.8% |
| 1979 | 100 1000 Int$ | +156.4% |
| 1980 | 186 1000 Int$ | +86.0% |
| 1981 | 187 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 1982 | 163 1000 Int$ | -12.8% |
| 1983 | 154 1000 Int$ | -5.5% |
| 1984 | 140 1000 Int$ | -9.1% |
| 1985 | 140 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 173 1000 Int$ | +23.6% |
| 1987 | 187 1000 Int$ | +8.1% |
| 1988 | 201 1000 Int$ | +7.5% |
| 1989 | 187 1000 Int$ | -7.0% |
| 1990 | 131 1000 Int$ | -29.9% |
| 1991 | 85 1000 Int$ | -35.1% |
| 1992 | 136 1000 Int$ | +60.0% |
| 1993 | 139 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1994 | 161 1000 Int$ | +15.8% |
| 1995 | 175 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 1996 | 182 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1997 | 155 1000 Int$ | -14.8% |
| 1998 | 198 1000 Int$ | +27.7% |
| 1999 | 222 1000 Int$ | +12.1% |
| 2000 | 156 1000 Int$ | -29.7% |
| 2001 | 236 1000 Int$ | +51.3% |
| 2002 | 348 1000 Int$ | +47.5% |
| 2003 | 278 1000 Int$ | -20.1% |
| 2004 | 91 1000 Int$ | -67.3% |
| 2005 | 86 1000 Int$ | -5.5% |
| 2006 | 76 1000 Int$ | -11.6% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 Int$ | -100.0% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2009 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2010 | 39 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2011 | 0 1000 Int$ | -100.0% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2013 | 27 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2014 | 0 1000 Int$ | -100.0% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2016 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2017 | 16 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2018 | 0 1000 Int$ | -100.0% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2020 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2021 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2022 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2023 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
| 2024 | 0 1000 Int$ | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 82.67 1000 Int$ | 22 1000 Int$ | 167 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 59.3 1000 Int$ | 0 1000 Int$ | 183 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 171.8 1000 Int$ | 140 1000 Int$ | 201 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 158.4 1000 Int$ | 85 1000 Int$ | 222 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 127.1 1000 Int$ | 0 1000 Int$ | 348 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.2 1000 Int$ | 0 1000 Int$ | 39 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 Int$ | 0 1000 Int$ | 0 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
- 169 French Polynesia 14 1000 Int$ compare
- 170 French Guiana 9 1000 Int$ compare
- 171 China, Hong Kong SAR 1 1000 Int$ compare
- 172 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 Int$ compare
- 172 Lebanon 0 1000 Int$ compare
- 172 Montenegro 0 1000 Int$ compare
- 172 Qatar 0 1000 Int$ compare
- 172 Republic of Korea 0 1000 Int$ compare
- 172 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 Int$ compare
- 172 Singapore 0 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Mauritius
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 17.99 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0462 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 599.72 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.1976 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6096 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.4% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value in Mauritius?
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value in Mauritius was 0 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 348 1000 Int$ in 2002.
- What is the lowest meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ in 1970.
- How does Mauritius rank for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
- Mauritius ranks 172nd out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.